ChaseDream
标题: 有一道小题没弄懂，希望有大大能帮忙解一下，谢谢！ [打印本页]
作者: 麦片小麦大麦茶 时间: 2020-2-6 16:43
标题: 有一道小题没弄懂，希望有大大能帮忙解一下，谢谢！
可能是一道很简单的题，C选项我不太懂，主要是因为我觉得C说的是如果大部分订阅者都是年轻人，不就正好符合题目中要吸引年轻人，所以要雇佣一些能写不同风格而非单一的老的风格的编辑吗
6.The magazine, Kiplingers Personal Finance, wants to change its writing style to increase readership since young adults seldom prefer to read old-style essays and thus have less incentive to read the magazine. To attract young adults and increase the number of subscribers,Kiplingers Personal Finance plans to employ some editors who can write essays in various styles.
最终目的：增加subscribers
Which of the following is a consideration in favor of the magazine’s implementing its plan to employ the editors? C ／A
A. The subscribers who only read the magazine’s old-style essays are far fewer than those whom new-style essays attract.
B. All of the editors the magazine has already employed can only write old-style essays.
C. The majority of readers who subscribe the magazine are young adults.
D. Some of the young adults prefer to read old-style essays and thus will not subscribe the magazine if the magazine changes to new style.
E. It will need time for the original subscribers to be familiar with and even to accept the new style.
作者: wu0h961738 时间: 2020-2-6 22:38
頂一下
雖然不確定但也分享一下自己的想法:
其他選項主題都很偏離，可以確定刪剩AC
C的話有點狡詐，以下思路供參考: 本來的的訂閱族群是年輕人，而且本來的寫作風格屬於old school，那可以推論出原本的族群是喜歡看老文章的文藝青年。
如果改成新式文章的話，可能會造成原本族群的退訂，而這些族群又佔majority ==>導致 no. of subscribers decreases
相對A來說更切重要點，點明喜歡新式文章的人多於喜歡舊式文章的人，那麼基於提升訂閱的考量，作ˋ出題幹的決策很合理。
作者: Carol凡凡 时间: 2020-2-22 22:42
A: new style可以吸引来比现有订阅者更多的人——>new style有很大可能可以增加订阅者 很好
C：订阅者中绝大多数是青年人。既然还没改风格他们已经订阅了，那改了风格也起不到增加订阅者的效果。不用改了。
作者: 大璇璇 时间: 2020-2-23 10:47
同意！
作者: 麦片小麦大麦茶 时间: 2020-8-8 18:43
谢谢！
作者: 麦片小麦大麦茶 时间: 2020-8-8 18:47
谢谢！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |