ChaseDream

标题: 885 section 2-19 [打印本页]

作者: XUANYA2005    时间: 2005-10-6 12:05
标题: 885 section 2-19

19.   Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.


(A) compensating state governments for damage to


(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of


(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging


(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage ofA


(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging



Choice A is correct. Choices B, C, and E could be read as saying that state governments can be compensated for damaging their own natural resources. The phrasing in C, D, and E is needlessly wordy, and for the damage of in D is unidiomatic. This question is difficult.



怎么认为 B, C, and E could be read as saying that state governments can be compensated for damaging their own natural resources. 是不是那个“damaging”在作怪?NN们解释拉兄弟一把!


作者: XUANYA2005    时间: 2005-10-7 09:09

自己顶!



作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2005-10-8 00:55

楼主留心一下选项间compensating for 的对象不同


A是compensating...for damage(名词)


而以C为例,give compensation for damaging their natural resources


红字部分就是他们的差异


作者: XUANYA2005    时间: 2005-10-18 12:00

明白了,谢谢三脚猫版主!






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3