ChaseDream

标题: GWD [打印本页]

作者: 全幼儿园最可爱a    时间: 2019-11-5 09:07
标题: GWD
Proposed new safety rules for the Beach City airport would lengthen considerably the minimum time between takeoffs fiom the airport. In consequence, the airport would be able to accommodate 10 percent fewer flights than currently use the airport daily. The city’s operating budget depends heavily on taxes generated by tourist spending, and most of the tourists come by plane. Therefore, the proposed new safety rules, if adopted, will reduce the revenue available for the operating budget.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

B Few, if any, of the tourists who use the Beach City airport do so when their main destination is a neighboring community and not Beach City itself.

E The response to the adoption of the new safety rules would not include an increase in the number of passengers per flight.



想问一下B为什么错了,B说很少有游客的目的地是别的城市,也就是说很多人还是去旅游的,所以航班数量减少游客数量就会减少。和E起到的效果是一样的啊。

作者: momoyi    时间: 2019-11-5 09:37
B的意思是说:去其他地方的游客大都不会使用beach city的机场了。
这些游客与beach city的游客花销无关啊。
我们关注的是来beach city旅游的,而不是去其他地方旅游的人
作者: 全幼儿园最可爱a    时间: 2019-11-5 09:48
自己想明白了
B取反之后是只有一小部分人的目的地是B城市。这一小部分人的数量减少还是会导致B城市的财政收入减少,加强。但E取反,航班减少每班乘客增多,游客不会减少,所以财政收入不会减少。要是选项说的是,所有人都是来B城市旅游的,取反是没有人是来旅游的,所以收入不会减少,削弱。
作者: 藏镜人    时间: 2020-7-14 12:58
你好可爱啊。航班减少-游客纳税钱少-影响。b有啥关系与这个逻辑?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3