ChaseDream
标题: 想问下各位大神一道CR的题目!! [打印本页]
作者: 求上700 时间: 2019-11-4 12:20
标题: 想问下各位大神一道CR的题目!!
Many industrialized nations are trying to reduce atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, a gas released by the burning of fossil fuels. One proposal is to replace conventional cement, which is made with calcium carbonate, by a new "eco-cement." This new cement, made with magnesium carbonate, absorbs large amount of carbon dioxide when exposed to the atmosphere. Therefore, using eco-cement for new concrete building projects will significantly help reduce atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
- AThe cost of magnesium carbonate, currently greater than the cost of calcium carbonate, probably will fall as more magnesium carbonate is used in cement manufacture.
- BEco-cement is strengthened when absorbed carbon dioxide reacts with the cement.
- CBefore the development of eco-cement, magnesium-based cement was considered too susceptible to water erosion to be of practical use.
- DThe manufacture of eco-cement uses considerably less fossil fuel per unit of cement than the manufacture of conventional cement does.
- EMost building-industry groups are unaware of the development or vailability of eco-cement.
- 一直在BD两个选项里面纠结,D选项正确的原因我理解了
- 关于B选项,我自己的理解是重复前提
- OG的解释是即使吸收了二氧化碳变硬,eco-cement不一定能作为广泛运用的建筑材料,更谈不上减少二氧化碳了
- 我自己觉得OG的解释确实是有道理,但是不知道怎么归这一类的错误(OG的的解释总让我觉得它是在根据具体情况破案,不是在做题哈哈哈)另外感觉平常自己做题想不到这个点,想问问大神们是缺乏练习吗,
作者: AlanHeeee 时间: 2019-11-4 13:47
闲,随便说两句
不要分类,不要琢磨为什么(如何支持/反对),不要你以为应该怎样
原文就一个事,用一个新的MC代替传统 的C,因为可以减少二氧化碳
选项只有D说到了化石燃料,和二氧化氮多少的事情沾点边,留着;其他都不沾,杀。结束
#这是你考场时候的唯一可行方法
作者: 求上700 时间: 2019-11-4 19:36
有道理哈,谢谢!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |