ChaseDream

标题: 关于With用法的详细解析 [打印本页]

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-11-1 17:16
标题: 关于With用法的详细解析

with + [noun] + [noun modifier possibly] on GMAT Sentence Correction

with的用法，之前自己也比较迷糊，稍微研究了下。看到一起考试的群里大家也有很多疑问，所以就整理了一下。如果有实质上的错误，请大家指出来我来改。总之，考试的一路上感谢CD和G友们的帮助，也希望对大家有所帮助。

大原则：（防尘回复可见）

测试方法:

把主句主语和with紧接的noun连接，看语义是否成立，比如前面的例子

Rachel has three kids (ok）
CEO has sales (不ok)
General has medals (ok)

OG19例子：#751、#674、#692

Practice problems

1) With Arcsun Corporation announcing their new home video system, Playlite has to upgrade their systems to compete with them.

(A) With Arcsun Corporation announcing their new home video system, Playlite has to upgrade their systems to compete with them

(B) With Arcsun Corporation announcing its new home video system, Playlite must upgrade their systems in competition with it

(C) Because Arcsun Corporation is announcing their new home video system, Playlite has to upgrade its own systems by competing with them

(D) Since Arcsun Corporation is announcing their new home video system, Playlite is to upgrade their systems by competing with them

(E) Since Arcsun Corporation has announced its new home video system, Playlite must upgrade its own systems to compete with Arcsun

2) With a rotational axis tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, Uranus exhibits extreme seasons: hemispheres go from continuous sunlight to continuous darkness in its 84-year cycle.

(A) With a rotational axis tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, Uranus exhibits extreme seasons: hemispheres go

(B) With a rotational axis tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, Uranus exhibiting extreme seasons, because hemispheres went

(C) Uranus has a rotational axis that is tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, exhibiting extreme seasons, and the hemispheres went

(D) Uranus’s rotational axis tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, it exhibits extreme seasons, with hemispheres going

(E) As a consequence of a rotational axis that is tilted nearly parallel to the plane of the Solar System, Uranus exhibited extreme seasons, such as the hemispheres going

3) With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed the America Fleet to ambush the Japanese and win a decisive victory.

(A) With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed

(B) With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

(C) Because of the American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, to allow

(D) Because American cryptanalysists had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing

(E) Since American cryptanalysists broke the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

4) With a global team of analysts studying every move of the Asian market, Boisin Capital, prepared each morning for that day’s major market trends that its accuracy on predicting an “up” or “down” day in the Western Markets is higher than 98%.

(A) With a global team of analysts studying every move of the Asian market, Boisin Capital, prepared

(B) With a global team of analysts studying every move of the Asian market, Boisin Capital is so prepared

(D) Because a global team has been studying every move of the Asian market, Boisin Capital, so prepared

(E) Because of a global team which had been studying every move that Asian market made, Boisin Capital is as prepared

5) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily.

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them.

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few.

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicting significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left.

Practice problem explanations

1) Split #1: As explained in this blog, this question contains a “Case I” use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure, action by a different actor. In the main clause, Playlite is the actor, and in the “with” phrase, Arscun Corporation is another actor. This is wrong. For this other actor, we need a new clause. (A) & (B) are wrong because of this.

Split #2a: Pronouns! Both companies are collective nouns. Collective nouns such as Arcsun Corporation or Playlite may have many members, but they are singular nouns and, as such, demand singular pronouns.

(A) “their” … “their” … “them” = totally wrong

(B) “its” … “their” … “it” = right on Arcsun, wrong on Playlite

(D) “their” … “their” … “them” = totally wrong

(E) “its” … “its” = pronouns are correct

Split #2b: another pronoun mistake is using the same pronoun in the same clause to refer to two different antecedent. In (A) & (D), even if the “their” and “them” were correct in singular/plural, they would be wrong because they refer to two different antecedent. If the sentence had all “it” and “its,” this still would be incorrect, because we can have multiple it’s referring to different antecedents. This is precisely why we needed to repeat Arcsun’s name in (E).

Answer = (E)

2) Split #1: As explained in this blog, this question contains a “Case II” use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure, additional description. The participle following “with” is not an action word: it merely paints a picture, describes the appearance of the planet Uranus. This is 100% acceptable, so we can’t eliminate anything on the basis of this split.

The sentence is radically reorganized on each choice, so we have to analyze each choice separately.

(A) “with”-phrase, comma, independent clause, colon, independent clause. = that’s a grammatically correct organization of a sentence, and there are no errors; this choice is promising.

(B) “with”-phrase, comma, [noun] + [participle], “because” + [subordinate clause] = this sentence has no independent clause; it commits the missing-verb mistake. This is wrong.

(C) [independent clause], comma, [participial phase], comma, “and,” [independent clause] = that’s a grammatically correct organization of a sentence, but there’s no logical connection between “exhibiting extreme seasons” and what the hemispheres do. The extreme seasons and what the hemispheres do seem like two separate things in this version, whereas one is an explanation of the other in the prompt. This changes the meaning. Also, there’s a mismatch of verb tenses, because “went” is past tense. This is wrong.

(D) [absolute phrase], comma, [short independent clause], comma, “with”-phrase = this could be a grammatically acceptable organization, but the antecedent of the pronoun “it” is “Uranus’s,” which is in the possessive. The “with”-clause at the end is arguably the acceptable kind discussed in this blog, but the very short independent clause, following by a much longer “with”-phrase, is awkward. This is wrong.

(E) [prepositional phrases][noun modifying clause], comma, [independent clause], comma, [subordinate clause] = this could be a grammatically acceptable organization, but the verb tense “exhibited,” past tense, is wrong. Also, the description of the hemispheres explains what is meant by “extreme seasons,” but it’s not an example of “extreme seasons;” the latter is what the construction “such that” implies. Finally, this is excessively wordy. This is wrong.

The only possible answer is (A).

3) Split #1: As explained in this blog, this question contains a “Case I” use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure, action by a different actor. In the main clause, the Japanese Imperial Fleet is the actor, and in the “with” phrase, the American cryptanalysists are other actors. This is wrong. For this other actor, we need a new clause. (A) & (B) are wrong because of this. Choice (C) is a similar mistake: another preposition, “because of,” with [noun] + [participle] structure, action by a different actor; this is also wrong.

Split #2: Adjective vs. adverb. The answer choices vary between the adjective “strategic” and the adverb “strategically.” What’s happening here? Think about the situation. The folks in the Japanese Imperial Fleet wanted the element of surprise, but they lost it. Having the element would have been good: it was a “strategic” element of surprise. Losing the element of surprise was very bad: there was nothing “strategic” about losing the element of surprise. All the answers that have the formulation “… strategically lost the element of surprise…” are wrong: choices (B) & (C) & (E) make this mistake.

Split #3: pronoun mistake. A pronoun can have as its antecedent a noun or other pronoun, but the antecedent of a pronoun cannot be the action of an entire clause. Choices (B) & (E), at the end of the underlined section, use the pronoun “this” to refer to the action of the previous clause. Unlike a pronoun, a participle such as “allowing” can modify a verb or an entire clause.

The only possible answer is (D).

4) Split #1: As explained in this blog, this question contains a “Case II” use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure, additional description. As discussed above, one way to tell that it’s “Case II” is to imagine the sentence without the participle phrase at all.

“With a global team of analysts, Boisin Capital, prepared …”

That makes perfect sense by itself. Boisin has a global team of analysts. Now, if we add the participial phrase, we are merely adding description, not an essential action. This is 100% acceptable, so we can eliminate anything on the basis of this split.

The sentence is radically reorganized on each choice, so we have to analyze each choice separately.

(A) This choice commits the famous missing-verb mistake. The main noun is “Boisin Capital,” and this is followed by a participle, “prepared,” but it never gets a bonafide verb. This is incorrect.

(B) The “with” structure at the beginning is fine, and there are no mistakes. This choice is promising.

(C) This choice make use of the hypothetical language, “would be,” which is strange and awkward. It also makes the idiom mistake “as prepared … that,” instead of “so prepared . . . that.” This in incorrect.

(D) The “because” clause at the beginning is fine, but this choice also commits the missing-verb mistake, similar to (A). This is incorrect.

(E) The “because of” construction at the beginning is fine, but this choice makes the idiom mistake “as prepared … that,” instead of “so prepared . . . that.” This in incorrect.

The only possible answer is (B).

5) A question about the Henry V‘s victory at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415.

Split #1: As explained in this blog, this question contains a “Case I” use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure, action by a different actor. In the main clause, the English longbowmen are the actors, and in the “with” phrase, the muddy field is another actor. This is wrong. One way to see this, as discussed above, is to examine the sentence without the participle:

With the muddy field, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage …

This makes no sense. The English longbowmen weren’t doing anything with the muddy field. An essential piece of the action has been lost in dropping that participle. For a separate actor performing a separate action, we need a whole new clause. (A) & (B) are wrong because of this.

The sentence is radically reorganized on each choice, so we have to analyze each choice separately.

(A) In addition to the problematic structure at the beginning, this choice repeats the Case I mistake at the end, a double whammy! This is completely incorrect.

(B) In addition to the problematic structure at the beginning, this choice repeats the Case I mistake immediate after the first: two incorrect “with” + noun] + [participle] structures right in a row. Also, the antecedent of “their” is exceptionally unclear and ambiguous. This choice is incorrect.

(C) This choice makes no mistakes. All the pronouns have clear relationships with their antecedents. This is promising.

(D) This choice has a combination of small problems. The tense mismatch in the first part, “tried … but had been delayed,” doesn’t make sense. Presumably, the “trying” and the “being delayed” would be more or less simultaneous. Also, that first part is very wordy. The overall sentence is just connect with a string of and’s, and this gives no sense of the logical interconnection of these events, what cause what. The antecedent of “their” is ambiguous. The hypothetical tense, “would reduce,” is strange and awkward for a factual historical event. This choice is incorrect.

(E) The first part of the sentence is unusual: it appears to be an absolute phrase, but the logical relationship of this action to the rest of the sentence doesn’t fit the use of the absolute phrase. Furthermore, an absolute phrase would not be connected to the main clause by the word “and.” The antecedent of “their” is ambiguous. Here again, the overall sentence is just connect with a string of and’s, and this gives no sense of the logical interconnection of these events, what cause what. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (C).

补充阅读：

Case I: action by a different agent

This first case is the 100% wrong case. Think about it this way. The independent clause of a sentence has a subject and verb, and that subject is the “actor,” the doer-of-the-action, in the main clause. If we want to talk about a different “actor” performing a different action, then we need another clause: either a second independent clause, joined by a correlative conjunction (e.g. “and“, “but“, “or“) , or a pair of correlative conjunctions; or a dependent clause, introduced by a subordinate conjunction or a relative pronoun/adverb.

Subordinate conjunctions: ON A WHITE BUS: Only if; Now that; Although, after, as; While, whereas, whether; If, in case; Though; Even though, even if; Because, before; Until, unless; Since, so, so … that.

Relative pronoun: who, whom, whose, what, that, which, whoever, whatever

Relative adverbs: why, how, where, when, however, wherever, whenever

If the main clause talks about one actor and his action, and we want to discuss a second actor and his separate action, we need a full clause, either independent or dependent. That’s the rule.

The mistake is to use this structure, “with” + [noun] + [participle], as a substitute for a full clause. For example,

[attach]242278[/attach]

In sentence #6, in walking to Canossa, the Emperor Henry IV is one actor performing one action in the subordinate clause, and Pope Gregory VII is another actor performing a different action in the main clause. In sentence #7, the CEO is one actor performing one action in the main clause, and the sales are another “actor” doing something else. In each case, the correct solution is to use a subordinate clause, a full clause to contain a new action. In both cases, using the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure in the place of a full clause is completely wrong. This use will always be wrong on the GMAT Sentence Correction.

Case II: additional description

This second case is perfectly acceptable. In this case, there is an actor performing an action in the main sentence, and the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure simply acts a noun modifier to provide some additional description to one of the nouns. This structure doesn’t contain a whole new action performed by somebody else, but merely adds what we might call some artistic detail to the sentence. For example

[attach]242279[/attach]

In both cases, there’s not another “actor” performing an action in addition to the action of the main clause. Instead, the “with” phrase adds some descriptive detail to the sentence: it functions as a noun-modifier, as an adjectival phrase. What’s being described in the “with” phrase is not an action but merely a fixed detail of something. This is 100% correct, and could appear as part of the OA in a GMAT Sentence Correction question.

One test

One way to tell the difference is to imagine the sentence without the participle phrase, just “with” + [noun]. If the sentence still makes perfect sense in this form, then the participle was purely descriptive, we are in Case II, and the use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure is perfectly legitimate. If we drop the participle, and suddenly after the word “with” we have an unconnected noun that has no obvious relationship to the rest of the sentence, then the participle was providing an important action, we are in Case I, and the use of the “with” + [noun] + [participle] structure is not acceptable. For example, using the sentences above:

[attach]242280[/attach]

Notice that this opening preposition phrase now makes no sense. It is an unconnected noun hanging out at the beginning of the sentence with no obvious grammatical connection to the rest of the sentence. The Pope did not perform his action “with” the Emperor. This sentence makes no sense, because the participle in version 6b was providing an action that was an essential part of the sentence. That action needs a clause of its own. By contrast,

[attach]242281[/attach]

This make perfect sense. The Euglena manufactures food with its chloroplasts. This sentence works either with or without the participle phrase, so that phrase must be purely a decoration, a detail, not essential to the action in the sentence. This is Case II, and sentence #9 is perfectly correct as is.

参考：Ron SC 视频

参考：MIKE MᶜGARRY ON JULY 1, 2015 , UPDATED ON JULY 27, 2017, IN GMAT SENTENCE CORRECTION, GMAT VERBAL

作者: 700冲鸭 时间: 2019-11-1 17:56
嗯，给好看的群主点赞

作者: 麦西维熙 时间: 2019-11-1 18:02
Mark一下！

作者: 莫澜22 时间: 2019-11-1 18:17
我来学习了谢谢你你好快啊

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-11-1 18:19

700冲鸭发表于 2019-11-1 17:56
嗯，给好看的群主点赞

好看的是点赞的宝宝么：）

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-11-1 18:20

莫澜22 发表于 2019-11-1 18:17
我来学习了谢谢你你好快啊

哈哈...精华是别人的内容，我就是稍微总结整理了以下..

作者: 悉尼全智贤 时间: 2019-11-1 18:31
看一下！

作者: 豆豆遛 时间: 2019-11-1 20:46
Mark一下！

作者: 豆豆遛 时间: 2019-11-1 20:46
同意！

作者: 藍色鑽石王 时间: 2019-11-1 22:29
看一下！

作者: JZ700 时间: 2019-11-2 07:09
7000

作者: Lucy_0813 时间: 2019-11-2 19:41
感恩会好好看的！

作者: 怂怂要加油 时间: 2019-11-2 20:25
回复

作者: 逛街的乌龟 时间: 2019-11-3 16:02
Mark一下！

作者: 余饭饭 时间: 2019-11-4 19:35
谢谢~

作者: Biong 时间: 2019-11-4 19:57
看一下！

作者: 语法学习爱好者 时间: 2019-11-4 20:33
顶楼主！

作者: baolu12321 时间: 2019-11-5 01:20
x谢谢总结啊

作者: 考上硕士好归家 时间: 2019-11-6 10:00
谢谢

作者: joy.july 时间: 2019-11-6 12:17
顶顶谢谢分享呀~

作者: 前途无限清新苑 时间: 2019-11-6 13:51
Mark一下！

作者: 张什么昆来着 时间: 2019-11-6 14:43
m

作者: An_qi 时间: 2019-11-6 20:13
看一下！

作者: An_qi 时间: 2019-11-6 20:36
看一下！

作者: lidiaaaaaa 时间: 2019-11-6 21:07
同意！

作者: ripple_018 时间: 2019-11-6 21:37
居然是新帖子，來支持樓主

作者: litquidity 时间: 2019-11-6 23:39
看一下！

作者: Gmat要考760 时间: 2019-11-7 00:28
xiexie

作者: Metamorphosis_ 时间: 2019-11-7 14:15
感谢楼主！

作者: Yeeyyx 时间: 2019-11-7 18:25
看一下！

作者: Ninazxwang 时间: 2019-11-9 14:09
加油

作者: unik_ray 时间: 2019-11-9 14:29
感谢分享！！！！

作者: tangmianmian 时间: 2019-11-9 19:12
看一下！

作者: 有只小怪兽QAQ 时间: 2019-11-10 01:10
Mark一下！

作者: Hexin.S 时间: 2019-11-10 11:06
同意！

作者: CD用户1309558 时间: 2019-11-10 11:38
感谢楼主无私奉献

作者: 无敌卡布达 时间: 2019-11-10 15:01
看一下！

作者: 蛋卷酱 时间: 2019-11-10 16:07
看一下！

作者: Zxhshhs 时间: 2019-11-11 13:02
看一下！

作者: tatotao8346 时间: 2019-11-11 20:44
dingdingding

作者: sjy01654 时间: 2019-11-11 22:35
xiexie

作者: shaGinA 时间: 2019-11-11 23:51
顶楼主！

作者: shuyuliang 时间: 2019-11-12 23:53
看一下！

作者: derrickzq 时间: 2019-11-13 08:56
同意！

作者: 打东来的喇嘛 时间: 2019-11-13 20:18
感谢楼主~

作者: 汉哥最棒 时间: 2019-11-13 22:15
看看看

作者: let's 时间: 2019-11-14 04:17
同意！

作者: Hellen_1987 时间: 2019-11-14 10:20
感谢

作者: 大张wilson 时间: 2019-11-14 18:41
看一下！

作者: 刘雪静 时间: 2019-11-14 23:57
Ff

作者: Echo0507 时间: 2019-11-15 00:18
Mark

作者: scmylxq 时间: 2019-11-15 02:32
Mark一下！

作者: scmylxq 时间: 2019-11-15 02:34
看一下！

作者: janna要去德国 时间: 2019-11-15 14:58
看一下！

作者: blackmerry 时间: 2019-11-16 00:02
感谢

作者: chrisyu214 时间: 2019-11-16 01:20
h好文推荐

作者: tj7874 时间: 2019-11-16 01:31
同意！

作者: s_zard 时间: 2019-11-16 03:10
同意！

作者: 牛奶不够甜cc 时间: 2019-11-16 08:58
同意！

作者: zzzsssfff123 时间: 2019-11-18 15:54
感谢分享！

作者: 云鑫 时间: 2019-11-19 00:03
Mark一下！

作者: 冲呀鸭鸭 时间: 2019-11-22 00:36
顶楼主！

作者: 百万！ 时间: 2019-11-23 17:28
Mark一下！

作者: ygu223 时间: 2019-12-4 10:09
感谢分享！

作者: 蛋卷酱 时间: 2019-12-6 14:08
看一下！

作者: graceye0901 时间: 2019-12-7 04:15

看一下！

作者: pinx 时间: 2019-12-7 09:44
thx

作者: carrie667 时间: 2019-12-7 10:30
顶楼主！

作者: fiona75 时间: 2019-12-7 23:00
感谢分享！

作者: donotguess 时间: 2019-12-8 00:32
看了这个，豁然开朗啊！！！牛?

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-9 12:56

donotguess 发表于 2019-12-8 00:32
看了这个，豁然开朗啊！！！牛?

哈哈哈...看到有人认真看了好感动...因为真的是认真发现总结的

刚刚做OG又看到有题来加个例子

作者: 雷姆的英雄 时间: 2019-12-11 21:57
dd

作者: shelleytang 时间: 2019-12-12 08:27
感谢分享！

作者: 不要再玩了 时间: 2019-12-12 08:41
感谢楼主解决一直以来困扰我的问题

作者: 一只土豆 时间: 2019-12-13 21:43
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1ce62cabd15abe23482f4ddf.html
hello楼主~想请问这个链接里第三个点中举的一个例子：with the cost...，many people... 这个该如何理解呢？

作者: 杨不可爱 时间: 2019-12-14 10:47
谢谢楼主

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-14 12:11

一只土豆发表于 2019-12-13 21:43
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1ce62cabd15abe23482f4ddf.html
hello楼主~想请问这个链接里第三个点中举的 ...

Hello hello，我去外网查了原题，确实是一个比较特殊的情况

首先对比了原题中的其他选项，其他几个选项都有致命的错误，比如主句没有动词，再比如句子中的while和从句的时态发生了冲突。在这个前提下，我的理解是应了gmat的老道理，就是任何规律都有特殊例外的情况，选择是在比较中得出的。

然后我看了下大神Ron对这道题的解释，他大概的意思是他也觉得这个正确选项有点奇怪的，不过学到的新东西就是with...ing的形式可以用于表达和主句同时发生，这道题就是这个用法。

希望这个解释有帮助。That's something new I learn as well. Thank you for pointing it out!!

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-14 12:22

一只土豆发表于 2019-12-13 21:43
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1ce62cabd15abe23482f4ddf.html
hello楼主~想请问这个链接里第三个点中举的 ...

仔细想下用我帖子原理也说的过去，就是people have mobile phones and the cost of wireless service (后半部分稍微有一点点用力）

作者: 一只土豆 时间: 2019-12-14 19:09

Lingling_K11 发表于 2019-12-14 12:22
仔细想下用我帖子原理也说的过去，就是people have mobile phones and the cost of wireless service (后 ...

感谢楼主这么认真地解答！另外今天看到OG19 SC02303一道题目:
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction...
OG是以with有可能错误修饰前面紧邻的名词（在介词短语中）的理由排除掉错误答案D和E的，这与大原则1的“原则上修饰核心名词”有所不同，不知是否有用，仅供参考～（不过Ron不是用这点来排除的）

作者: 求一地金保佑 时间: 2019-12-15 07:46
看一下！

作者: Deananaley 时间: 2019-12-15 15:36
先马

作者: flyxiang 时间: 2019-12-16 02:27
顶楼主！

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-17 11:48

一只土豆发表于 2019-12-14 19:09
感谢楼主这么认真地解答！另外今天看到OG19 SC02303一道题目:
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, h ...

哈哈...认真去查了这个，这里的with跟我们的讨论没有关系呢，是idiom的用法

a brush with sb/sth = a short unfriendly meeting with sb; an occasion when you nearly experience sth unpleasant

作者: Maypark 时间: 2019-12-18 10:41
感谢分享！

作者: Zelll 时间: 2019-12-18 13:04
顶楼主！

作者: 浪荡秋风 时间: 2019-12-19 22:22
一个例子关于
【3. 如果with 引导的部分是另一个主体的动作，而不是直接描述主句的主语/前面的核心名词】
Prep2007E2-SC-110
The ivory-billed woodpecker, once the largest woodpecker in North America at a striking 20 inches tall, has moved in and out of the extinct category, with scientists consistently unable to find solid proof that the bird still exists.
虽然with不是划线部分，但是这个句子的with确实引导了另一个主体scientists?

作者: Alisa0921 时间: 2019-12-20 10:46
Mark一下！

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-23 10:21

浪荡秋风发表于 2019-12-19 22:22
一个例子关于
【3. 如果with 引导的部分是另一个主体的动作，而不是直接描述主句的主语/前面的核心名词】
P ...

啊啊啊啊啊，感谢例子，啪啪打脸呀

这道题倒是一个很老的题目的，之前跟一个高手聊，发现gmac总是会给你跟大规律相悖的例子的，包括最常考的which什么的。anyway，我只能因为这题是老题+不是画线部分+例外的方式来说服自己了。至于说帖子总结的大规律，我到目前拿起来都还是很好用的...

童鞋有没有相关的你觉得比较信服的关于with的解释？

作者: 浪荡秋风 时间: 2019-12-23 18:51

Lingling_K11 发表于 2019-12-23 10:21
啊啊啊啊啊，感谢例子，啪啪打脸呀

这道题倒是一个很老的题目的，之前跟一个高手聊，发现gmac总是会给你 ...

我在SC正确句子合集里，搜索所有"with"，总共十几个句子。当时纠结了一会，所以贴上来讨论

刷完正确句子，我发现大部分正确句子的"with"，都是用在句中，而不是句首的，且with引导对象和主句对象有从属关系，【同楼主，with原则上修饰前面最近的核心名词】例：
1. Orb-weaving spiders such as the argiope build webs that are essentially wheel-like, with an outer rim and a number of spokes emanating from the hub.
an outer rim and a number of spokes 属于 webs

2. Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.
arms and legs 属于monkey

只发现两个例外：
1. The ivory-billed woodpecker, once the largest woodpecker in North America at a striking 20 inches tall, has moved in and out of the extinct category, with scientists consistently unable to find solid proof that the bird still exists.（之前发的，引导了一个独立对象scientists ）

2. With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee. （With表背景，原因）

这两个例外我觉得最符合楼主所说的语义补充功能【2. With…, …(main clause), 两部分在语义上要互相补充加强】

同意总结大规律的策略，没必要纠结例外。SC最终是考语义，而不是语法规则，从语义出发，总会有例外。

就大部分来看，楼主你总结得非常精准了已经
我是28号的考试，共同加油

作者: Lingling_K11 时间: 2019-12-24 10:20

浪荡秋风发表于 2019-12-23 18:51
我在SC正确句子合集里，搜索所有"with"，总共十几个句子。当时纠结了一会，所以贴上来讨论

刷完正确句子 ...

棒呆!
你的例外里面例2也有其他童鞋之前也有提到，我稍作解读people have mobile phones还勉强能说得过去，然后搜了下原题，其他的选项都有major错误，所以还会提醒自己注意最优选项来自比较之中。

贴一下原题：
Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.
(A) Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people
(B) As the cost of wireless service plummeted in the last year and as mobile phones became increasingly common, many people
(C) In the last year, with the cost of wireless service plummeting, and mobile phones have become increasingly common, there are many people
(D) With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are
(E) While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are

最后祝顺利出分呀!!! Break a leg!!!

作者: Mochiyue 时间: 2019-12-25 21:36
顶楼主！

作者: 青雀雀要冲720 时间: 2019-12-25 22:36
谢谢楼主分享！

作者: yjhygmat750 时间: 2019-12-28 09:13
Mark一下！

作者: 爱酸奶的小雀斑 时间: 2019-12-28 14:00
Mark

作者: vyeung 时间: 2019-12-31 11:56

作者: Butian 时间: 2020-1-3 16:14
Mark一下！

作者: joycehan09 时间: 2020-1-6 16:56
感谢分享！

作者: 邶风角 时间: 2020-1-6 17:17
看一下

作者: Seven_7 时间: 2020-2-13 20:35
Mark一下！

作者: luoyiruoyi 时间: 2020-2-25 05:29
Mark一下！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)