ChaseDream

标题: 新发布的官方难题300的一道sc 大神求助！！! [打印本页]

作者: 清清9913 时间: 2019-10-6 16:16
标题: 新发布的官方难题300的一道sc 大神求助！！!

A natural response of communities devastated by earthquake or flood is to rebuild on the same site, overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated.

A.overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated

B.overlooking the possibility that the forces causing it could be repeated

C.overlooking that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one

D.without considering that the forces causing the disaster could be repeated

E.without considering that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another such disaster

正确答案是E

我的问题是：1、介词without是修饰前面哪个词呢，我不太清楚comma+介词的用法。

2.这个forces 为什么用cause another disaster要比repeated好呢，我觉得repeated表达的清楚简洁啊? 求指教

3. C选项和E选项 another such disaster为什么又要比another one 好呢？是不是因为one一般指代单数名词，而 disaster是不可数？？？

作者: 青槐 时间: 2019-10-7 11:49
个人见解不一定对
1. commas加介词的修饰对象可以有很多，要根据语境来看，主要是看逻辑主语对不对，这里的逻辑主语是community,所以用法是正确的，abc的逻辑主语都是response错误
2，这里我觉得是从语义出发，如果只是repeated不一定会表达出cause another such disaster的意思，
3 Ron说过在有明确的名词和代词之间，选名词，不会有指代不清的情况，所以disaster会更好
这题用排除会更好，根据逻辑主语排除abc, D里面的causing表示动作的持续性，没有that caused好

作者: 清清9913 时间: 2019-10-7 16:54

u青槐发表于 2019-10-7 11:49
个人见解不一定对
1. commas加介词的修饰对象可以有很多，要根据语境来看，主要是看逻辑主语对不对，这里的 ...

嗯嗯谢谢，我觉得关键点还有一个是forces。不应该是forces被重复，这样不符合逻辑，而是forces造成的disaster又来了一场，所以forces be repeated 的选项先排出。其次 such disaster要比one要更准确有效。所以选E

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)