标题: RON在论坛的一个回复,没看懂,求大神解答!!感谢!! [打印本页] 作者: 你亦渡风来 时间: 2019-8-30 10:43 标题: RON在论坛的一个回复,没看懂,求大神解答!!感谢!! Good Day Ron
kindly tell me if the following construction legit atience Lovell Wright became well known as much for X as for Y.
according to jlucero (in the thread above ) this is correct but according to you this sentence has some redundancy issue . if this sentence has redundancy then kindly tell me how
Re:This sentence would be correct, because "well known" is separate from "as much".
I was describing the redundancy that would ensue from using both "well" AND "much" in the same construction.
E.g.,
My T-shirts are not as well worn as yours. (correct)
My T-shirts have not been worn as much as yours. (correct)
*My T-shirts have not been well worn as much as yours. (redundant)
为什么第一个例子的well known和as much是分开的,不是redundant,而最后一个例子就是redundant?作者: momoyi 时间: 2019-9-2 15:50
Lovell Wright became well known as much for X as for Y.
My T-shirts have not been well worn as much as yours.
第一个 X,Y都是well know 发出的动作,well know for X as well know for Y.
这个well和much没有任何冲突。
第二个well worn和 worn as much as 说其中一个就可以了 as well worn as 或worn as much as
这两个意思一样,所以well和much, 明显的redundant。作者: AMBER513 时间: 2019-9-2 21:14