标题: Pack3付费题库里有一题SC不是很理解，求指教！ [打印本页] 作者: Monica2020 时间: 2019-7-29 16:05 标题: Pack3付费题库里有一题SC不是很理解，求指教！ Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
A.politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend
B.politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended
C.politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending
D.an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish was postponed by politicians, who instead proposed a series of smaller steps, intending
E.an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish has been postponed by politicians, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended
这道题我当时选的是C选项，从句意等其他split可以排除A.D.E，但是B选项我没选是因为我认为propose a series of smaller steps这个动作应该和postpone...平行，C选项除了for protecting 不优选我暂时没找出其他错误，在KKK上面的回复里也没有特别有参考价值的，所以想请大家帮我分析一下B和C选项，谢谢啦
作者: 耳朵小丸子 时间: 2019-7-29 18:43
B is correct because of two reasons-
1. intention is supposed to be shown by infinitive to and plan to is right in option B
2. intended to is the right idiom
I feel option C is wrong because of the following reasons-
1. plan for is wrong usage and for is never used to show intention. For is used to give reason or example
2. they can amiguously refer to wild salmon and endangered fish
3. intending i.e comma + ing normally modifies the subject of previous clause and the subject is they(can be wild salmon and fish or politicians) but logically it should be the series of smaller steps intending to protect the fish
