ChaseDream

标题: 18OG SC [打印本页]

作者: jadaliu 时间: 2019-4-11 23:15
标题: 18OG SC

#18 OG SC 754

The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.

A

that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
B

that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
C

having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
D

cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also
E

cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but

问题：A选项的“were arising"有什么问题呢？后面不是跟着simultaneously吗？就是过去正在崛起不行吗？请教各位大大！

作者: leonlo 时间: 2019-4-12 11:02
你还没有分清它后面想要修饰那个所以错了，建议你用心看看。

作者: jadaliu 时间: 2019-4-12 11:14

leonlo 发表于 2019-4-12 11:02
你还没有分清它后面想要修饰那个所以错了，建议你用心看看。

你的意思是that were arising那一句在这里是修饰Middle East的，不是修饰societies的所以错了吗？但我记得Ron说过定语修饰可以跳过前面的介词短语去修饰核心词，只要介词短语是修饰前面的核心词的吗？

作者: leonlo 时间: 2019-4-12 11:23
所以按照你这样说，为什么不选直接修饰而选一个跳跃修饰呢那

作者: HoganTong 时间: 2019-4-12 14:55
SC问题请把下划线加上，这个事在论坛上说了一百遍了都。。。

首先，A首先修饰的位置不对，定语从句是可以跳跃修饰，但那时在五个选项全都跳跃修饰的情况下才可以，但凡有没跳跃的选项，都优于条约修饰。其次，再次强调一遍SC不是考语法，是考语义。看题干说的是什么的evidence？是中东北部城市和南伊拉克城市同时但独立的蓬勃发展的这个事的evidence，你怎么能说evidence是中东北部城市的evidence呢？evidence对应的肯定是一件事，而不是一个东西，对吧？A选项that were arising...是定语从句modifier，把这部分去掉等于是说evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East，这不合逻辑，evidence不可能for一个名词，肯定是for一个事。

作者: jadaliu 时间: 2019-4-13 09:41

HoganTong 发表于 2019-4-12 14:55
SC问题请把下划线加上，这个事在论坛上说了一百遍了都。。。

首先，A首先修饰的位置不对，定语从句是可以 ...

好的，明白了，谢谢！

作者: jadaliu 时间: 2019-4-13 09:43

leonlo 发表于 2019-4-12 11:23
所以按照你这样说，为什么不选直接修饰而选一个跳跃修饰呢那

嗯嗯，我明白了！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)