ChaseDream
标题: Bible中的weaken类的一道题目，希望大神们帮帮我，超级感谢！！~~ [打印本页]
作者: zzzzzzjw 时间: 2019-1-17 09:26
标题: Bible中的weaken类的一道题目，希望大神们帮帮我，超级感谢！！~~
A new state-sponsored tax law aimed at increasing the state’s college attendance rate gives local public universities tax incentives to encourage acceptance of a greater percentage of applicants from within the state. Legislators supporting the new law believe that it will not only allow more students from the state to obtain further education, but also provide a strong financial boost to in-state universities.
Which of the following, if true, would provide the strongest critique of the legislators' proposal?
(A) Public universities receive the majority of their funding through state-sponsored initiatives.
(B) Public universities are generally less expensive than private universities.
(C) Many college applicants find that relocating to a new state is the single largest obstacle to attending college.
(D) Public universities feel that having a broader applicant pool is more financially beneficial than the incentives provided under the new law.
(E) Applications to universities within the state reached an all-time high for the previous academic year.
这个题，我有疑问的有两个地方：
①谁是conclusion句，谁是premise句呢？（是怎么判断出来的？）
②到底反驳点是什么？（是new law不该实行，还是new law的applicant并没有增加，而是减少；又或者是后面的两个好处的反驳；）我都有点晕了，不知道到底应该反驳哪一个点，给的点太多了（new law该不该实行？还是applicant的多少？还是financial boost？）
作者: thinkworm 时间: 2019-1-17 14:34
完全备考小白的答案：e ，感觉这点比其他都狠地驳斥了立法者
作者: zzzzzzjw 时间: 2019-1-17 15:08
E是不对的....之前的时候就in-state applicant就已经达到了巅峰，如果再有new law就更会吸引更多的applicant了。所以E是支持原文的，而不是反对的。
作者: thinkworm 时间: 2019-1-17 16:12
正确答案有吗
作者: zzzzzzjw 时间: 2019-1-17 16:18
正确答案是D，这个其实是很明显的，我其实就是在分析其他答案的时候，出现了理解上的歧义
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |