标题: 问一个逻辑题 [打印本页] 作者: dandan74 时间: 2003-9-1 08:12 标题: 问一个逻辑题 For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists. The statement above best support which of the following conclusions? (A) Where public-service workers are permited to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike. (B) Where strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available. (C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for pubblic-service workers where it is the onlky available means of settling labor dispute with such workers. (D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector. (E) A strike by workers ina local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator. 为什么选A呢，这道题诗什么意思呢? 我总是无法建立答案和原题的联系。求教！求教作者: liu9903 时间: 2003-9-2 23:52
如果我没记错的话，答案好像是C！