ChaseDream

标题: 关于that的跳跃修饰 [打印本页]

作者: 查查的假发    时间: 2018-11-23 03:18
标题: 关于that的跳跃修饰
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.
A as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
B as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
C was a well-established method of mineral extraction
D was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
E had been a method of mineral extraction, well established
答案是C

D选项解释是 that was修饰不清;而且as early as the eighteenth century时间状语无法做method的表语,应该使was变为助动词,后面加上一个过去分词作为谓语动词,如that was established as early as…。


想问一下,抛开as early as... 不能做表语这个错误,为什么说that was修饰不清呢?that was应该可以跳跃修饰前面的method of extracting mineral结构中的method吧?是因为相比C(不存在跳跃修饰)D更容易出现修饰不清的问题(that前有两个名词可被指代)吗?这个应该是一个相对性错误吧?

作者: 蟹黄味蚕豆    时间: 2018-11-23 09:35
that的部分 这么想应该没什么问题
但是你这么改了之后呢 d选项的表达就变得啰嗦了 尤其是跟c相比起来 可以用一个adj或一个词组表达的 却要通过一个定语从句来表达
所以除了指代不清意外 还会存在不简洁的问题

omg 你是有时差 还是真的复习到深夜啊
作者: 查查的假发    时间: 2018-11-23 13:54
蟹黄味蚕豆 发表于 2018-11-23 09:35
that的部分 这么想应该没什么问题
但是你这么改了之后呢 d选项的表达就变得啰嗦了 尤其是跟c相比起来 可以 ...

谢谢!!!
时差啦~人在欧洲。。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3