ChaseDream

标题: prep一题~感谢大家! [打印本页]

作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-28 17:00
标题: prep一题~感谢大家!
Since the start of the space age, more and more littering has occurred in orbits near Earth, often because the intentional discarding of lens caps, packing material, fuel tanks, and payload covers.
A more and more littering has occurred in orbits near Earth, often because
B orbits near Earth have become more and more littered, often from
C orbits near Earth became littered more and more, often resulting from
D there have been more and more littering of orbits near Earth, often because of
E there had been littering more and more of orbits near Earth, often with

OA是B,D选项不太理解,看起来不太对劲但是说不出来哪里不对,除了because of用得不准确之外,其他的问题是什么呢?其次,littering在这里算名词吗?












作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-28 17:01

作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-28 20:42
有人吗:)
作者: candream    时间: 2018-10-28 21:17
有的
作者: candream    时间: 2018-10-28 21:21
D项 littering of orbit 改变了原本的句意,原句意是:orbit 附近出现了很多的垃圾,而不是 出现了很多orbit的垃圾,littering在这里是动名词,就当litter 的名词形式
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-28 21:42
candream 发表于 2018-10-28 21:21
D项 littering of orbit 改变了原本的句意,原句意是:orbit 附近出现了很多的垃圾,而不是 出现了很多orbi ...

谢谢!明白了
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-29 20:49
candream 发表于 2018-10-28 21:21
D项 littering of orbit 改变了原本的句意,原句意是:orbit 附近出现了很多的垃圾,而不是 出现了很多orbi ...

Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more.
A some others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of at least thirty feet and more
B the others, such as the Bay of Fundy, that have tides of more than thirty feet
C others, such as the Bay of Fundy, have tides of more than thirty feet
D those at the Bay of Fundy, which has tides of more than thirty feet
E the ones at the Bay of Fundy have tides of at least thirty feet and more

麻烦您看一下这道题!我觉得some…others…像在说一些地方xxx,其他(所有)地方都xxx,而some…some others…是说一些地方xxx,还有其他一些地方xxx
所以我觉得A比较对!可以解答一下吗?
作者: 芊芊有想法    时间: 2018-10-30 13:06
D选项,there没有指代前置词,如果作为有的话没有orbits near 这样简洁。of我感觉没有办法make sense,littering 语义对于前面是adv修饰才对,但是后面承接of ,又应该是做n修饰,这个littering修饰有问题…SC渣渣个人见解……
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-30 16:00
芊芊有想法 发表于 2018-10-30 13:06
D选项,there没有指代前置词,如果作为有的话没有orbits near 这样简洁。of我感觉没有办法make sense,litt ...

指代前置词是啥?there be句型不是倒装句吗,后面接名词,这里的there be句型我感觉没有错?
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-10-30 16:06
芊芊有想法 发表于 2018-10-30 13:06
D选项,there没有指代前置词,如果作为有的话没有orbits near 这样简洁。of我感觉没有办法make sense,litt ...

littering应该是个动名词诶我觉得
作者: fuckoffand    时间: 2018-11-1 09:06
小陈冲鸭 发表于 2018-10-29 20:49
Tides typically range from three to six feet, but while some places show no tides at all, some othe ...

C 吧?A --'at least 30ft and more'当中的at least和more重复鲁
而且从语意来看,some have... others have... 就是列举两种情况,一些地方...其他的...
如果some have.. some others...似乎还有其他的情况,同时这种说法也不idiomatic

作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-11-1 09:45
fuckoffand 发表于 2018-11-1 09:06
C 吧?A --'at least 30ft and more'当中的at least和more重复鲁
而且从语意来看,some have... others  ...

对对 答案是c
谢谢~反正以后遇到这种情况我就知道了
作者: 芊芊有想法    时间: 2018-11-1 21:03
小陈冲鸭 发表于 2018-10-30 16:06
littering应该是个动名词诶我觉得

there be 有2种方式,一种是指代前面的内容,一种是倒装(常常被诟病不够简洁),littering是名词,根据前半段句意应该作为副词修饰(然而不是comma+ing,没有这种功能)所以与后面它作为的n冲突,不是否定它是不是n,而是这里不应该是n修饰
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-11-2 10:53
芊芊有想法 发表于 2018-11-1 21:03
there be 有2种方式,一种是指代前面的内容,一种是倒装(常常被诟病不够简洁),littering是名词,根据 ...

明白了~谢谢:)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3