ChaseDream

标题: 显示bug 删帖 [打印本页]

作者: Zoe-    时间: 2018-10-17 11:40
标题: 显示bug 删帖
删帖



作者: aapril13    时间: 2018-10-17 18:08
我觉得是排除法~
如果说不能确定despite the fact that 这种用法是不是最优 就先不看这部分
当主语是the lead attorney and his assistant时 谓语动词应为were而不是was -- 排除a d
bombard后面如果接him则指代不明 应接attorney --a c e
最后看b 尽管有些wordy 但问题不大 毕竟在排除完所有语法错误以后 利用wordiness来排除选项是最后一步才需要做的
引用一下曼哈顿原话
“You cannot eliminate just based on wordiness until you have dealt with all potential grammatical issues. In fact, a wordier answer can be right (especially on a more difficult question) if the less wordy options contain grammatical errors.
If you have two options that both appear to be completely grammatically correct and both have a clear and unambiguous meaning, then you can use concision or "wordiness" to decide. But only if you've already dealt with any grammar and clarity issues.”
作者: Zoe-    时间: 2018-10-18 11:06
aapril13 发表于 2018-10-17 18:08
我觉得是排除法~
如果说不能确定despite the fact that 这种用法是不是最优 就先不看这部分
当主语是the l ...

感谢解答~真心觉得排除法在实战很有效

经查证despite加名词是可以的
不过E的 Despite entering这个用法不对啦 despite不能加doing
作者: AMBER513    时间: 2019-9-8 16:45
看一下!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3