ChaseDream

标题: gmatla毕出老师直播课总结 [打印本页]

作者: ceylon_ 时间: 2018-9-25 18:54
标题: gmatla毕出老师直播课总结
自己总结了gmatla上直播课的内容~

--update了一下附件，里面贴了一题Ron的解释，谢谢kluivert。

update again------一战分手失败，这个好像也没大用，伤心?

作者: kluivert 时间: 2018-9-25 22:43
顶楼主！

作者: kluivert 时间: 2018-9-25 22:58
Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.
这道题不知道为什么要改写，而且我查了gmatclub,Ron大神的解析，没有任何人提到carry 的用法 .... 我觉得这个有点吹毛求疵，完全没必要。
他的东西好多都不敢苟同，觉得你还是去看看gmatclub,mahanttanprep上的分析吧

作者: kluivert 时间: 2018-9-25 23:36
Oxford dictionary :

He says my sister was the inspiration for his heroine.
Clark was the inspiration behind Saturday's victory

Infection 那个解释，无语的 the other infections 怎么就包括smallPox ... 。Ron对此的解释是the 太明确了，就是把所有其他的infections都包含了,自己看看...都说了other 还什么包括smallpox
Monkeys 题里的whose 指代不清 Branches or monkeys ?

There are 2 problems with A.
- Major problem is "THE other infections." THE is too definitive here, carrying the connotation of "every single one of the other infections."
* THE is also incompatible with "such as":
- Correct: I never read this book, but I read the other books on the shelf.
- Correct: I never read this book, but I read other books on the shelf, such as "Right Hand, Left Hand" and "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
- Incorrect: I never read this book, but I read the other books on the shelf, such as "Right Hand, Left Hand" and "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
- Minor problem is "what they had not..." vs. "something they had not..." The "what" construction is awfully strong, suggesting that this was THE ONE THING they hadn't thought possible.
* As an analogy, compare the meanings of "I want to do what I love for a living" and "I want to do something I love for a living." The first suggests that the speaker has one particular field in mind; the second doesn't.
Last edited by RonPurewal on Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total...

还有children那个题目，你换成children题目也不对。要比较也是in 1997 , children spent 而不是by 1997 , children had spent

作者: ceylon_ 时间: 2018-9-26 06:49

kluivert 发表于 2018-9-25 23:36
Oxford dictionary :

He says my sister was the inspiration for his heroine.

- infection那题我第一看视频讲解也很迷，仔细想想好像又有道理。其实我自己觉得从语义上讲，应该是鼓舞科学家去治疗和天花这种病类似的病（such infections），而不是除了天花外的病（the other infections）。
看了Ron的解释，我觉得更有道理！已update文件。
- 猴子那题，我觉得whose指的是monkey，因为whose不能指代物branches。所以我个人觉得错误点1.whose作定语从句描述猴子本身有的属性了，不对，应该是用状语描述动作。2.从句时态尴尬。
- children那个，我觉得 by 1967+过去完成时更合适吧。

谢谢交流^ ^

作者: kluivert 时间: 2018-9-26 07:26

ceylon_ 发表于 2018-9-26 06:49
- infection那题我第一看视频讲解也很迷，仔细想想好像又有道理。其实我自己觉得从语义上讲，应该是鼓舞 ...

哈哈
很多老外都会弄错
whose既可以指代人，又可以指代物
你想说的是who,whom只能指代人...that,which只能指代物

作者: ceylon_ 时间: 2018-9-26 10:08

kluivert 发表于 2018-9-26 07:26
哈哈
很多老外都会弄错
whose既可以指代人，又可以指代物

学习了谢谢！

作者: AMBER513 时间: 2019-9-1 21:04
看一下！

作者: January01 时间: 2021-8-3 08:22
顶楼主！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)