2018金融时报管理学硕士排名 - Financial Times Masters in Management (MIM) 2018 - ChaseDream

2018	2017	School Name	Country
1	1	University of St Gallen	Switzerland
2	2	HEC Paris	France
3	4	London Business School	UK
4	5	Essec Business School	France / Singapore
5	6	ESCP Europe	FR / UK / DE / ES / IT
6	10	Università Bocconi	Italy
7	15	University College Dublin: Smurfit	Ireland
8	11	Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University	Netherlands
9	9	Cems	See table note
10	3	IE Business School	Spain
11	8	Esade Business School	Spain
12	23	Stockholm School of Economics	Sweden
13	13	WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business)	Austria
14	12	University of Mannheim	Germany
15	14	Imperial College Business School	UK
16	7	WHU Beisheim	Germany
17	16	Edhec Business School	France
18	32	Shanghai Jiao Tong University: Antai	China
19	21	Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad	India
20	-	Kozminski University	Poland
21	21	Warwick Business School	UK
22	-	University of Economics, Prague	Czech Republic
23	28	Indian Institute of Management Calcutta	India
23	23	St Petersburg State University Graduate School of Management	Russia
25	35	Skema Business School	France / US / China / Brazil
26	26	Indian Institute of Management Bangalore	India
27	25	University of Sydney Business School	Australia
28	41	Frankfurt School of Finance and Management	Germany
28	19	HEC Lausanne	Switzerland
30	17	Nova School of Business and Economics	Portugal
30	38	Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics	Portugal
32	31	Iéseg School of Management	France
33	20	HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management	Germany
33	18	City University: Cass	UK
35	37	Eada Business School Barcelona	Spain
35	36	Tongji University School of Economics and Management	China
37	33	Maastricht University School of Business and Economics	Netherlands
38	38	Copenhagen Business School	Denmark
39	29	Audencia Business School	France
40	27	EMLyon Business School	France
41	40	Neoma Business School	France
41	42	Vlerick Business School	Belgium
43	33	Grenoble Ecole de Management	France / UK / Singapore
44	43	IQS/FJU/USF	Spain / Taiwan, China / US
45	30	Antwerp Management School	Belgium
46	45	Aalto University	Finland
46	51	Kedge Business School	France
48	48	Toulouse Business School	France
49	58	University of British Columbia: Sauder	Canada
50	56	Tias Business School	Netherlands
51	50	IAE Aix-Marseille Graduate School of Management	France
52	53	Montpellier Business School	France
53	-	Hult International Business School	US / UK / China / UAE
53	46	Queen's University: Smith	Canada
55	49	Cranfield School of Management	UK
55	55	ESC Rennes	France
55	60	Louvain School of Management	Belgium
58	54	ICN Business School	France
59	68	Warsaw School of Economics	Poland
60	59	Institut Mines-Télécom Business School	France
61	73	Lancaster University Management School	UK
62	62	Essca School of Management	France
63	57	Nyenrode Business Universiteit	Netherlands
63	66	University of Cologne Faculty of Management	Germany
65	52	University of Edinburgh Business School	UK
65	71	Hanken School of Economics	Finland
67	47	Durham University Business School	UK
68	43	Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management	Belgium
69	71	University of Victoria: Gustavson	Canada
70	74	University of Bath School of Management	UK
71	67	EM Normandie	France
72	65	NHH Norwegian School of Economics	Norway
72	80	EM Strasbourg Business School	France
74	88	Alliance Manchester Business School	UK
75	63	Henley Business School	UK
76	-	TUM School of Management	Germany
77	84	ISCTE Business School	Portugal
77	81	Burgundy School of Business	France
79	61	Leeds University Business School	UK
80	64	University of Strathclyde Business School	UK
81	70	Corvinus University of Budapest	Hungary
82	76	Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian	Singapore
83	-	University of Ljubljana Faculty of Economics	Slovenia
84	68	Université Paris-Dauphine	France
85	86	DCU Business School	Ireland
86	-	University of Liverpool Management School	UK
87	77	BI Norwegian Business School	Norway
88	79	University of Bradford School of Management	UK
89	94	Luiss University	Italy
89	-	University of Antwerp	Belgium
91	83	University of Exeter Business School	UK
92	78	Brunel Business School	UK
93	-	ISC Paris	France
94	75	La Rochelle Business School	France
95	84	Politecnico di Milano School of Management	Italy
96	91	Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow	UK
97	93	Nottingham Business School at NTU	UK
98	92	ESC Clermont	France
99	-	Hong Kong Baptist University School of Business	China
100	90	National Sun Yat-sen University	Taiwan, China

Table Notes

* Data in these columns are for information only and are not used in the rankings.

Some 230 points separate the top programme, University of St Gallen, from the school ranked number 100. The top 13 participants, from University of St Gallen to WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business), form the top group of Masters in Management providers. The second group, headed by University of Mannheim, spans schools ranked 14th to 45th. The third group includes 43 schools, from Aalto University at 46th to University of Bradford School of Management in 88th place. The remaining 12 schools headed by Luiss University make up the fourth group.

** Grande École programme

*** The Cems programme has 30 different members schools from 30 different countries.

‡ Limited access at masters level. Undergraduate degree in management, business or economics required.

A record 104 schools took part in the ranking process in 2018, up from 102 in 2017. Schools must meet strict criteria in order to be eligible. Their programmes must be full-time, cohort-based and have a minimum of 30 graduates each year. Finally, the schools must be either AACSB- or Equis-accredited. Courses are typically one or two years in length and must be directed at students with little or no work experience. Specialised programmes are not eligible.

The rankings are calculated according to information collected through two separate surveys. The first is completed by the business schools and the second by alumni who graduated in 2015.

The FT requires a response rate of 20 per cent of alumni, with a minimum of 20 responses, for schools to enter the ranking calculations. About 6,400 alumni responded to this year’s survey — a response rate of 29 per cent.

The ranking has 17 criteria. Alumni responses inform seven criteria that together contribute 58 per cent of the ranking’s total weight. The remaining 10 criteria are calculated from school data and account for 42 per cent of the weight.

The current average salary of alumni has the highest weighting, at 20 per cent. Local salaries are converted to US dollars using purchasing power parity rates supplied by the International Monetary Fund. The salaries of non-profit and public service workers, and full-time students, are removed. Salaries are normalised by removing the very highest and lowest salaries reported.

Salary increase is the second most important criterion, with a weighting of 10 per cent. It is based on the average difference in alumnus salary between their first MSc level job after graduation and their current salary, three years after graduation. Half of the weight is applied to the absolute salary increase and the other half is applied to the relative percentage increase.

International course experience and international mobility are two other significant criteria, each with a weight of 8 per cent. They measure the students’ international exposure during and after their degree.

Where available, information collected over the past three years is used for all alumni criteria, except “value for money”, which is based on 2018 figures only. Responses from 2018 carry 50 per cent of the total weight, and those from 2017 and 2016 each account for 25 per cent. Excluding salary-related criteria, if only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data are from 2018 and 2017, or 70:30 if from 2018 and 2016. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years’ data, to negate inflation-related distortions.

Data provided by schools are used to measure the diversity of teaching staff, board members and finance students, according to gender and nationality, and the international reach of the programme. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 (male:female) composition receive the highest score.

When calculating international diversity, in addition to schools’ percentage of international students and faculty — the figures published — the FT also considers the proportion of international students and faculty by citizenship.

An FT score is finally calculated for each school. First, Z-scores — formulas that reflect the range of scores between the top and bottom school — are calculated for each ranking criterion. These scores are then weighted and added together to give a final score. Schools are ranked according to these scores, creating the FT Masters in Management rankings 2018.

After discounting the schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated using all remaining schools. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated, and so on until the final ranking is reached.

Other information in the table — course fees and programme length, the number of students enrolled, the percentage of students who undertake internships and whether a relevant undergraduate degree is required — does not contribute towards the ranking.