ChaseDream

标题: 9.2二战690 分手失败发小狗 [打印本页]

作者: 表面的和平 时间: 2018-9-2 13:51
标题: 9.2二战690 分手失败发小狗
二战690 Q51 V30 IR5，
一站600 Q49 V23 IR5
对比一站有了挺明显的进步（毕竟一站的时候连寂静是什么都不知道。。。）准备再加把油冲击一下
数学做到后面几题才出现寂静原题，但是对平稳心态真的起了大作用
阅读四篇应该只有一片寂静，其他的求考古

AWA 主题公园营销某个主题公园(Scare xxx amusement park) 近三年营业额不好，marketing director给ceo汇报改正方案，因为小朋友来游乐园玩是大人选的，而参考汽车行业，大人在选择的时候是以安全优先的，所以他觉得主题公园也需要将以往的强调thrill的口号更改，改成thrill for children, safety for parents（大意），这样改了之后就会increase dramatically。

数学
考到了管子拐弯那道题，构筑选的166，中间两端是40，最外面两端是43（比中间长出一个半圆的半径）
考到了五边形组成圆，边上的中点数有多少个的问题（答案10）

考到了R和S两个人迎面走，R速度4 S速度6，R先走2小时，问S走了多久（构筑答1小时，蛮简单的，注意看是谁的时间就行）

还有一道X^4-Y^4除以(X-Y)^4能否确定，条件1：X+Y=7，条件2：X^2+Y^2=25，构筑选的E（无法得知X－Y）

另外还有一道很奇怪的题，说有一个正整数列每一项都不与其他重复，N是数列的项数，Sum是所有数字的和(原文是求和符号)，问下面哪个可以求得N的值
A：Sum＝N＋4
B：1和2都在数列中
构筑选的C，两个条件都存在时N＝3，Sum为7，数列为1，2，5
只有B明显不对，只有A还存在N＝2的情况，Sum＝6，数列为1，5或2，4

阅读（大意，详细求考古）
第一篇美国国债，美国是最大的债务国，两个观点一个觉得美国经济上升吸引外资，但是作者说如果是这样应该是直接债务投资，事实上外资现在都是portfolio投资；另一个观点觉得美国经济在变弱。作者还说这两个分析都不完整，因为没考虑globalization（有题）
一共3题，一道题是文章目的，一道题是两个分析的对比，一道是说作者觉得他们都错在哪里

第二篇 Group size鱼群规模的寂静里有，考的三道题也都是一样的。查寂静发现我还做错了1-2道。。。。。

第三篇 Scott和她的姐妹寄信，研究者由此推论出以前的女性交流不像通常想象那样的少。她们在信件里提到了共同的朋友，还有一起authorized xxx（构筑没读懂但是此处有题）
后来说这个发现说明了女性结婚后的交流变得更informal，之类之类。详细求考古～

第四篇也是知识产权（IP），但不是寂静里说到的那片，而是说在一些落后地区（ixxxxxxx ？？失去记忆）的知识产权规制来着。
大意就是说人们都觉得知识产权是western特有的东西，但是在一些落后地区也不像人们以为的那样什么规制都没有，而是有一些规制。有提到American Native等等。
详细求考古。。。

逻辑只记得寂静原题了，其他都失忆了～～

本来一站600还是很纠结的，二战考了690之后虽然还不够但是也打算申请一下试试了
接下来就祈福吧，准备10月再战一次，争取上700早日分手！！

作者: Hana1997 时间: 2018-9-2 14:54
顶楼主！

作者: qwezxc777 时间: 2018-9-2 15:17
求问楼主一二战之间隔了多久！

作者: billyisfragile! 时间: 2018-9-2 15:45
是原文吗？

The Bluestocking Sisters:Women’s Patronage, Millenium Hall, and "The Visible Providence of a Country"
Eve Tavor Bannet

Sarah Scott's life and opus have become separated from those of her sister, Elizabeth Montagu, by some accidents of history and ideology that have determined and partly falsified our interpretations of their work.1 The persistence of the notion that the sisters' lives took divergent, if not actively antagonistic, courses at or before Scott's marriage in 1751 is curious, since, even after sanitizing excisions made by early editors, Montagu's correspondence with Scott and other family members indicates not only that the sisters spent part of each year together and remained in close physical and epistolary contact throughout their lives, but also that they knew the same people, collaborated in the same philanthropic activities, shared reading matter, political positions, and a secretary, discussed each others' writings, and gave each other mutual authorial aid, as well as personal, familial, and social support.

Rereading the sisters' relationship through their discussions about patronage and lifelong cooperation in a variety of philanthropic endeavors reintegrates Sarah Scott and her opus into the Bluestocking circle, as recent collections by Nicole Pohl, Betty Schellenberg, and Gary Kelly have begun to do.2 Restoring Montagu to her place in Scott's life, and Scott to [End Page 25] her place in Montagu's inner Bluestocking circle, changes our understanding of Scott's concept of philanthropy and of the social position from which she advocated reform. It also gives Scott's estate novels central political relevance, and makes Montagu and second-generation Bluestockings heirs to Scott's utopian vision at Millenium Hall.

The sisters also add significantly to what we know about women's patronage. It has become clear that eighteenth-century women in the upper ranks did exercise power and participate in the public sphere in a number of important but informal ways. But perhaps inevitably, given our disciplinary divisions, we have been discovering these separately. Feminist historians, such as Elaine Challus, Sarah Richardson, and Judith Lewis, have uncovered the important roles that aristocratic women played both in electoral and family politics, and as patrons or brokers in the patronage system on which all political and ecclesiastical appointments depended.3 Literary and cultural historians, such as Dustin Griffin and Sarah Prescott, have shown that ladies were also active participants in the literary patronage system.4Other scholars, such as Beth Fowkes Tobin, Patricia Comitini, and Dorice Williams Elliott, have traced upper- and middle-class women's ultimately successful efforts to appropriate the new managed and institutionalized forms of philanthropic activity as a "properly female" activity, while demonstrating the efficacy of fictions such as Hannah More's Coelebs in Search of a Wife.

In the middle of the eighteenth century, however, these several strands of female power and activity were not yet necessarily separate and distinct. They were interwoven, first of all, in the language. Patronage referred both to the right to dispose of government or military offices, church livings, or other employments, and to "the action of a patron in giving influential support, favor, encouragement or countenance to a person, institution, or work" (OED). In this latter sense, institutional philanthropy—the financial support of a charity school or hospital—and the support or reward of a writer figured as forms of patronage.6 Indeed, as late as 1772, booksellers were being described as writers' patrons, as was the public when authors printed by subscription or on their own account.7 These different strands of patronage were also interwoven in women's lives in sometimes unexpected ways, for a variety of conflicting motives. The Bluestocking sisters, Sarah Scott and Elizabeth Montagu, who have not been considered from this point of view either in the literature on patronage and philanthropy or in critical studies of their lives and writings, have something to teach us here. [End Page 26]

Familial and Philanthropic Patronage
A much-cited letter from Elizabeth Montagu to one of her cousins, William Freind, describes Scott's and Lady Bab's household at Bath Easton, after the breakup of Scott's marriage, as a convent, "for by its regularity it resembles one." With Lady Bab's support...

作者: 表面的和平 时间: 2018-9-2 15:51

bzy! 发表于 2018-9-2 15:45
是原文吗？

The Bluestocking Sisters:Women’s Patronage, Millenium Hall, and "The Visible Providence ...

原文原文！！

作者: 表面的和平 时间: 2018-9-2 15:52

qwezxc777 发表于 2018-9-2 15:17
求问楼主一二战之间隔了多久！

一战五月底。。。战线拖太长了

作者: billyisfragile! 时间: 2018-9-2 16:07
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-416021-1-1.html
是原文吗？

作者: qwezxc777 时间: 2018-9-2 16:11

表面的和平发表于 2018-9-2 15:52
一战五月底。。。战线拖太长了

嗷嗷！我8.10一战也是600 报了915的考试怕二战太匆忙。请问您在这段时间内的具体复习内容有哪些呢？感谢回复！

作者: lixiqi123 时间: 2018-9-2 20:55
鱼群规模机经在哪？楼主？

作者: londons 时间: 2018-9-2 21:07

lixiqi123 发表于 2018-9-2 20:55
鱼群规模机经在哪？楼主？

楼主已经很厉害了，加油！！

作者: londons 时间: 2018-9-2 21:08

lixiqi123 发表于 2018-9-2 20:55
鱼群规模机经在哪？楼主？

回错了，阅读机经就有鱼群这篇

作者: londons 时间: 2018-9-2 21:09
谢谢楼主了

作者: lixiqi123 时间: 2018-9-2 21:16
这期的吗？没有鱼群啊

作者: VickyK 时间: 2018-9-2 22:14
?‍♀️?‍♀️?‍♀️为什么我50 34 也是690

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)