标题: 名词修饰名词好，还是名词+介词的组合好？ [打印本页] 作者: Stonecutter 时间: 2018-8-22 14:18 标题: 名词修饰名词好，还是名词+介词的组合好？ OG18 706
Using study groups managed by the principal popular organizations and political parties, the Swedish public was informed by the government about energy and nuclear power.
A) the Swedish public was informed by the government about energy and nuclear power
B) the government informed the Swedish public about energy and nuclear power
C) energy and nuclear power information was given to the Swedish public by the government
D) information about energy and nuclear power was given to the Swedish public by the government
E) the public of Sweden was given energy and nuclear power information by the government
这道题答案没什么问题，是B，但是有个修饰词的问题没搞明白：
OG上说，The Swdish public比the public of Sweden好，而energy and nuclear power information又不如information about energy and nuclear power好
到底这两种修饰方式哪个更好啊，是用名词修饰名词，还是加上介词短语？ 作者: 曹元成 时间: 2018-8-26 11:23
我感觉可以用其他考点规避掉这种很教条很晦涩的知识点 比如主动语态优于被动语态 这里的B是唯一的主动语态句子 在有明确施动者的情况下 主动语态清晰简洁
之后来讲楼主提到的问题 我也说不出很多条条框框 只能举一个我用来记忆的例子
Asian people, Asia people 和people from Asia
这是不是高下立判了呀Asian people用词相对于 people of Asia更简洁 而且没有歧义 但是Asia people 即使我们是非英语母语的学生 感觉上就很拗口 可以看做是最次的选择 甚至可以直接判错