ChaseDream

标题: 5.10 海外一战，难说分手，放点狗(1) [打印本页]
作者: 瞎扯蛋蛋    时间: 2018-5-11 00:38
标题: 5.10 海外一战，难说分手，放点狗(1)

RC：V35
数学：V51
同问720够不够S16_(:з)∠)_




作者: Rafael_Chen    时间: 2018-5-11 02:57
分数都一样，这么巧的吗。。
作者: 瞎扯蛋蛋    时间: 2018-5-11 05:30
Rafael_Chen 发表于 2018-5-11 02:57
分数都一样，这么巧的吗。。

就是V和Q差一分，巧极了~ 我估计申请季开始前要再考一次，想申UCLA的BA，感觉740/750比较稳
作者: zhoujy    时间: 2018-5-11 10:52
求楼楼确认女性那篇RC
Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminists both as a prelude to the marshaling of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality and as a polemical signal of the theoretical importance of gender difference in our constructions of the Renaissance
            or
            of any other historical period. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, cast in the role of the grandly erroneous patriarch, Joan Kelly was until recently cast as the good mother or muse in the field of renaissance (or early modern) feminist studies. In her famous essay of 1977, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” She challenged Burckhardt, and his cultural authority, with an argument for the Renaissance as a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, as all the books under review suggest, a significant trend in feminist scholarship has entailed a rejection both of Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and of Burckhardt’s rosy one. For reasons worth pondering, this trend seems most evident in books that focus on middling and upper-class women whose ability to write gave them unusual access to the historical record. These books offer what we might call a “cautiously optimistic” assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements while at the same time stressing the social obstacles they faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.”
另一段，說那個Tina K的，The nature, degree, and effects of a critical identification with the objects (subjects) of one’s inquiry are particularly vexing issues for the historians and literary scholars who study early modern women writers. Such women were – simply by virtue of their literacy – members of a tiny minority of the population, and it is risky to take their textual depictions of their experiences as representative of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina K’s fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers making “room for self-expression“ under adverse circumstances does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers.” When K does this, and also when she suggests that the women writers she studies, unlike royal women, were”typical of other women at that point of English culture”, she assumes too easily, I think, that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences including access to literacy, allows us to constitute them as a social group and as our object of analysis. Her book, like the others under review, shows little awareness of the critiques of this epistemological construction of “women” as an object of analysis mounted by writers such as…
Although K does not engage with the kind of questions posed by recent postmodern and postcolonial feminist writing, she is very acute on the important gaps that existed in Renaissance society (and by implication in our own) between ideologies oppressive to women, on the one hand, and women’s actual behavior, on the other. Anticipating L’s book, which deals with several of the same authors, K explores the ways in which (educated) women, from the middle and upper ranks of society, carved out “meaningful, productive, and creative roles” for themselves.
作者: billysen    时间: 2018-5-11 11:38
男性申请者720的话可能需要再刷；女性申请者720差不多了，可以不刷；
作者: 瞎扯蛋蛋    时间: 2018-5-11 11:48
zhoujy 发表于 2018-5-11 10:52
求楼楼确认女性那篇RC
Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance women “stood on a footing of perfect ...

不是的，但好像(不确定)是这个Jacob
作者: 瞎扯蛋蛋    时间: 2018-5-11 11:51
billysen 发表于 2018-5-11 11:38
男性申请者720的话可能需要再刷；女性申请者720差不多了，可以不刷；

感谢！打算暑期实习后花一个月时间赶在申请季前考出来，隔三个多月会不会影响很大呢？因为暑假前这段时候还要把托福准备好，才发现很多学校卡24分口语_(:з)∠)_
作者: billysen    时间: 2018-5-11 16:29
瞎扯蛋蛋 发表于 2018-5-11 11:51
感谢！打算暑期实习后花一个月时间赶在申请季前考出来，隔三个多月会不会影响很大呢？因为暑假前这段时候 ...

如果三个月完全不碰gmat等于重新准备了。。



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3