标题: 关于 comma-ing 的修饰问题 [打印本页] 作者: idsamsang 时间: 2017-10-14 12:37 标题: 关于 comma-ing 的修饰问题 To map Earth’s interior, geologists use a network of seismometers to chart seismic
waves that originate in the earth’s crust and ricochet around its interior, most rapidly traveling through cold, dense regions and slower through hotter rocks.
(A) interior, most rapidly traveling through cold, dense regions and slower
(B) interior, which travel most rapidly through cold, dense regions, and
more slowly
(C) interior, traveling most rapidly through cold, dense regions and more
slowly
(D) interior and most rapidly travel through cold, dense regions, and slower
(E) interior and that travel most rapidly through cold, dense regions and
slower
问题是关于 comma-ing 修饰问题，大量的题目都是 comma-ing 修饰主语，按照这个解释那么 traveling 应该是修饰 geologists use，但是这样逻辑上不符合。曼哈顿上说Generally, the agent of a COMMA + VERBing modifier is the NEAREST PRECEDING SUBJECT. 那么按照这个解释就是 comma+ing 形式具有临近原则，即，comma+ing 形式修饰最近的主语， traveling 就是应该修饰waves。 目前没有遇到其他特别的例子。大家如何考虑这个问题？我搜了很多帖子，大家有的说逻辑，有的说临近，也有反驳的声音。
作者: Lexiii 时间: 2017-10-14 12:56
我觉得这句话里 "(seismic waves) that originate in the earth’s crust and ricochet around its interior," 是离v+ing最近的句子，然后v+ing修饰这个从句和这个从句的主语seismic waves作者: Citrus77 时间: 2019-2-7 13:03