ChaseDream

标题: OG 17 749 比较省略的疑惑求解答~~ [打印本页]

作者: 李翘楚 时间: 2017-9-17 07:56
标题: OG 17 749 比较省略的疑惑求解答~~
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
(A) While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
(B) While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
(C) Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
(D) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
(E) The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
答案是B，对E有问题。
The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as（ the cost of running ）other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
为什么不可以当作这样的省略呢，而是一定要加for？？这样不是更好吗？
困扰很久了，新手求解答，

作者: ai559031 时间: 2017-9-17 19:09
不補出for的話, 會有歧異：變成cost of running nuclear plants (事情） vs power plants (名詞）

相反的, 如果補出for的話, 看的人就會知道是在比較"運轉核電廠所需成本" 與“運轉其他電廠所需成本“, 是在比較兩件事情

作者: Shuriiiii 时间: 2017-9-17 19:11
我个人的理解，不太确定，省略的话应该是按照：The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as（the cost for) other types of power plants. 因为这句话的主语是cost，如果直接按照E这样来的话，就前后不平行了，就相当于拿the cost和other types of power plants 做对比，如果按照你那样理解的话，省略得太多了。。。

作者: danyuchn 时间: 2017-9-17 19:44

ai559031 发表于 2017-9-17 19:09
不補出for的話, 會有歧異：變成cost of running nuclear plants (事情） vs power plants (名詞）

相反的 ...

正解。

作者: 李翘楚 时间: 2017-9-18 18:43
谢谢你，明白！！！

作者: 李翘楚 时间: 2017-9-18 18:44

ai559031 发表于 2017-9-17 19:09
不補出for的話, 會有歧異：變成cost of running nuclear plants (事情） vs power plants (名詞）

相反的 ...

同意！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)