ChaseDream

标题: 求助,OG里的SC题目。 [打印本页]

作者: KatnissC    时间: 2017-8-20 11:24
标题: 求助,OG里的SC题目。
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
          很多答案解析说   如果选ACE, in attributing 的逻辑主语是后面的 the perpetrators ,就是错误。为什么呢?perpetrators不能自己把罪因   归因为食物过敏吗?




作者: Fiona09    时间: 2017-8-22 15:44
介词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语,即perpetrator

修饰成分in attributing修饰的对象应该是defense attorneys,但是ACE中的用法使得修饰成分错误地修饰了perpetrateors。
作者: KatnissC    时间: 2017-8-28 09:36
Fiona09 发表于 2017-8-22 15:44
介词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语,即perpetrator

修饰成分in attributing修饰的对象应该 ...

懂了,谢谢~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3