ChaseDream

标题: 辞职两个月刷G,8.17一战730,放狗 [打印本页]

作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-18 00:37
标题: 辞职两个月刷G,8.17一战730,放狗
上午刚从北京考完G,Q 50,V 39, IR 6. 中午因为贪小伙伴一顿午餐,结果高铁没票了。。。此刻在平生第一次坐的卧铺车上放狗给大家。考试前一天晚上超级紧张,一直失眠到3点,比高考还紧张 555,小仙女和小王子(?)不要向我这样。早餐吃的是面包+红牛,正是那罐红牛让我一直精神抖擞撑到现在放狗。。。
7月10号晚上报的G,结果第二天早晨醒来刷CD发现换库了,要不要这么频繁啊。。当时纠结了一天要不要改,最后还是决定考一次试试,六天时间说多不多,说少也不少了,已经有很多JJ放出来了,就当给这两个月的复习做个检测,考的不好就当成激励知耻而后勇了。在这里要感谢CD的前辈和G友们的无私分享和奉献!先放狗!


作者: Greenviewlouie    时间: 2017-8-18 01:25
恭喜LZ!!!感谢LZ放狗
作者: gar_bbbbb    时间: 2017-8-18 01:33
感谢楼主放狗。楼主可以看看新的阅读是这个吗??

Any analysis of why the early fourteenth-century agrarian economy was so predisposed to 'crisis' necessarily requires careful consideration of class and property relations on the land, for, as Robert Brenner and S. H. Rigby have both emphasized, these could be of decisive importance. At that time landlords exercised feudal rights of lordship over their tenants, many of whom were of servile status and therefore legally subordinate to their lords. This power relationship shaped the tenurial relationship between those who owned the land and those who occupied and worked it. Thus it was tenure, as regulated by landlords, that determined the supply of holdings and the form and level of rents that were charged. Until recently it was widely believed that feudal tenurial relationships sanctioned and facilitated the extra-economic exploitation of tenants by their lords. Together, the heaviness of rent charges and the arbitrariness of lordship discouraged and depressed tenant investment in agriculture. Meanwhile, lords were more interested in pursuing a feudal lifestyle of conspicuous consumption than in enhancing the productivity and profitability of their estates. The upshot, it has been claimed, was a vicious circle of underinvestment, static technology, and low and declining agricultural productivity.

Such pessimistic views of lords and their relations with their tenants have long exercised a compelling appeal. Nevertheless, they have become increasingly difficult to reconcile with a growing body of historical evidence. The preoccupation with serfdom overlooks the numerous free tenants who were exempt from the most coercive aspects of lordship. Free tenants mostly paid fixed and low rents and their property rights enjoyed the protection of the royal courts. The more substantial customary tenants were, in fact, relatively well off. Many of these tenants certainly paid a proportion of their rent in labour, but historians, probably because of a modern abhorrence of the institution of forced labour, have exaggerated its economic significance. In reality, only a minority of tenants actually performed labour services, and the aggregate value of rents in cash far exceeded that of rents in kind. Notwithstanding the much-vaunted powers of lordship, tenants had long been remarkably effective at opposing efforts by lords to raise rents and increase labour services in line with rising land values and commodity prices. They did so by countering seigniorial power with custom and denying that, as tenants, they were obliged to pay their lords anything more than a de facto ground rent for the land. Tenant right, in fact, often proved more powerful than landlord right.

As this article argues, the fact that so many tenants were in such conspicuous economic difficulties by the early fourteenth century had less to do with feudal lordship per se and the supposed oppressions and inequalities of serfdom, than with the contradictions and inefficiencies inherent in the coexistence of customary, contractual and commercial relationships. Herein lay the real source of the agrarian problem in the early fourteenth century. In so far as lords were the inadvertent agents of this adverse state of affairs, it was because their dealings with their tenants were typically more compliant than coercive. By yielding to tenant demands for access to land on terms that were so favorable to the tenants, lords created the preconditions for the subdivision and subletting that stoked population growth and thereby engendered the rural congestion that was the source of so much under- and unemployment, with all the negative consequences that this implies for labour productivity, living standards and purchasing power. This deteriorating situation in the countryside acted as a brake upon the continued growth of the economy and, from 1315, left increasing numbers ever more cruelly exposed to the heightened risk of environmental hazard
Para1:
B:傳統的觀點認為,lord給tenant,特別是serf tenant (隸屬於lord的,給其交租納貢的tenant),帶來了極大的經濟壓力,因為tenant要交很高的稅負,要孝敬lord,缺乏人身自由。
Para2:
P:但是,這一觀點是不正確的,雖然老觀點有著很大的吸引力(作者用了compelling),但是它越來越不能回答近期發現的一些新證據(主題句)。
S:因為其一,有很大一部分是non serf tenant,這些人只要交很低的錢,有很大的自由度,小日子還挺滋潤;其二,即便是serf tenant,他們的生活也沒有那麼糟糕,他們還是有一定自主權的,諸如lord要增加稅賦的時候,他們可以提出反對意見,並且有一定的力量。
Para3:
S:但是中世紀的經濟還是惡化了,這是為什麼呢?究其原因,是因為,為了應付tenant想多租地擴大自身利益的欲望,地主想出了一系列方法。。。,生詞很多,看不太懂。。。結果就是造成巨大的 unemployment in rural area. 地主的這種做法相當於對經濟的一個“brake”,阻礙了14世紀的英國經濟發展。lord在表面上向tenant做了讓步使tenant獲得短期經濟利益,但是從長期來看,lord通過這些舉措遏制了人口和經濟的發展,並最終帶來了社會環境的惡化。


1,主旨题
答案:貌似evaluate14世纪英国经济停滞不前的真正原因
2,Free tenant例子的作用
答案:大意是说,举了个例子说明老观点不能解释一些新的evidence
3,关于landlord赋予free tenant对土地的权利,作者同意哪个
选项有,
A.serve the short term and long terminterest of landlord;
B.serve the short term and long terminterest of tenant;
C.serve neither short term nor longterm interest of landlord;
D.serve neither short term nor longterm interest of landlord;
E.serve short term interest of tenantbut not the long term

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/past_and_present/v188/188.1campbell.html

http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-565089-1-1.html

作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-18 06:58
gar_bbbbb 发表于 2017-8-18 01:33
感谢楼主放狗。楼主可以看看新的阅读是这个吗??

Any analysis of why the early fourteenth-century agr ...

是的呢!好厉害 是考古?
作者: gar_bbbbb    时间: 2017-8-18 09:16
leonorhao 发表于 2017-8-18 06:58
是的呢!好厉害 是考古?

是的!以前的大牛的考古。我等下给阅读整理君贴过去。谢谢楼主!
作者: Omeng    时间: 2017-8-18 17:41
为什么20天内要全搞定?。。
赶第一轮吗?
作者: Alexisssss    时间: 2017-8-19 07:19
感谢构筑~
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-19 08:11
Omeng 发表于 2017-8-18 17:41
为什么20天内要全搞定?。。
赶第一轮吗?

是的呢,不喜欢战线拉太长~ 还有就是弄完就可以去浪了呀~
作者: 王百卉    时间: 2017-8-19 08:45
感谢楼主!我也是北京考27号一战,给了我关于考场的信息!没那么方了~
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-21 11:32
王百卉 发表于 2017-8-19 08:45
感谢楼主!我也是北京考27号一战,给了我关于考场的信息!没那么方了~

恩 最重要的一点就是,考完一场就忘掉一场,千万不要再想了,会影响下一场的~   加油!
作者: SUSUWH    时间: 2017-8-21 12:22
感谢分享!               
作者: NicholeNn    时间: 2017-8-21 16:22
恭喜楼主!

想请楼主帮忙确认下数学56题是选B吗?条件2:给了一个之后A和B的平均数都不变 -> A的平均数和B的平均数相等 ->条件2充分。谢谢~
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-21 16:27
NicholeNn 发表于 2017-8-21 16:22
恭喜楼主!

想请楼主帮忙确认下数学56题是选B吗?条件2:给了一个之后A和B的平均数都不变 -> A的平均数和B ...

这道题我选的是B,但是我也不敢打包票,毕竟数学没得满分···
作者: NicholeNn    时间: 2017-8-21 16:28
leonorhao 发表于 2017-8-21 16:27
这道题我选的是B,但是我也不敢打包票,毕竟数学没得满分···

好的,谢谢楼主啦
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-21 17:44
NicholeNn 发表于 2017-8-21 16:28
好的,谢谢楼主啦

不客气  加油!
作者: Omeng    时间: 2017-8-22 18:05
leonorhao 发表于 2017-8-19 08:11
是的呢,不喜欢战线拉太长~ 还有就是弄完就可以去浪了呀~

我也是辞职在家...拖到9月中旬考G了。。觉得好虚啊呜呜
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-22 18:27
Omeng 发表于 2017-8-22 18:05
我也是辞职在家...拖到9月中旬考G了。。觉得好虚啊呜呜

我考试之前也很虚,所以考试前一天晚上失眠到3点~
辞职考G,的确压力比较大。但是成就感也是满满的~
9月中旬的话,就着重针对自己薄弱的Section复习~
考试前一周可以根据机经有的放矢~
我因为第一次考就像着上700就好了,但比想象的好。
加油~
作者: Omeng    时间: 2017-8-22 21:27
leonorhao 发表于 2017-8-22 18:27
我考试之前也很虚,所以考试前一天晚上失眠到3点~
辞职考G,的确压力比较大。但是成就感也是满满的~
9月 ...

谢谢!!感觉可以搞个辞职党或者工作党的申请群,哈哈
作者: qqgggg    时间: 2017-8-22 22:21
NicholeNn 发表于 2017-8-21 16:28
好的,谢谢楼主啦

问一下!这道题的思路是什么!谢谢
作者: qqgggg    时间: 2017-8-22 22:23
NicholeNn 发表于 2017-8-21 16:28
好的,谢谢楼主啦

条件1,如果b 给a 一个 中位数相等,那b 给a 的应该就是a的中位数!可以set不是没有数能重复吗!这样还能变成set吗
作者: NicholeNn    时间: 2017-8-23 10:58
qqgggg 发表于 2017-8-22 22:23
条件1,如果b 给a 一个 中位数相等,那b 给a 的应该就是a的中位数!可以set不是没有数能重复吗!这样还能 ...

如果题目里没有对set内的数要求不能重复的话,是可以有重复的。

另外给完后中位数不变不一定能推出b给a的就是中位数,有可能是中位数和邻近两项数相同。举例:
a: 1, 2, 3, 3, 7
b: 1, 3, 3, 5, 10
假设把B的10给了A,a和b的中位数还是没有变。
作者: leonorhao    时间: 2017-8-23 21:22
qqgggg 发表于 2017-8-22 22:21
问一下!这道题的思路是什么!谢谢

我当时考场上是这样考虑的:因为A和B都是奇数个,那么要想在B给A一个之后,两个集合的中位数都不变,只有一种情况,那就是B给A的那个数就是A和B的中位数,那么就相当于,A和B在给完之后变成一样的集合了,那么他们的平均数在给完之后也一定相同,所以这个条件是不满足的。
作者: qqgggg    时间: 2017-8-24 22:09
leonorhao 发表于 2017-8-23 21:22
我当时考场上是这样考虑的:因为A和B都是奇数个,那么要想在B给A一个之后,两个集合的中位数都不变,只有 ...

谢谢!!!
作者: qqgggg    时间: 2017-8-24 22:10
NicholeNn 发表于 2017-8-23 10:58
如果题目里没有对set内的数要求不能重复的话,是可以有重复的。

另外给完后中位数不变不一定能推出b给a ...

谢谢!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3