ChaseDream

标题: chelseayang斑竹推荐一下读物吧 [打印本页]

作者: fxs_007    时间: 2005-9-2 20:03
标题: chelseayang斑竹推荐一下读物吧
以下是引用chelseayang在2004-12-6 10:44:00的发言:

To read some books on philosophy  can be a good training in difficult sentence comprehension.


Reading articles in the Economist may help your understanding of the structures, since those articles are neither too long nor short.   



philosophy的和economicst的读物philosophy斑竹推荐一下吧

谢谢


作者: fxs_007    时间: 2005-9-2 20:05

还有就是


你用过eyeq么?


感觉怎么样?


我刚才试了一下,感觉很难


作者: lelewang    时间: 2005-9-2 21:42
what is "eyeq"?


作者: fxs_007    时间: 2005-9-2 23:17
eqeq is a software designed by infinite mind sepcially for improving user's reading speed. u can find detailed formation on http://www.infmind.com/default.asp?link=SV33home
作者: jeremyang    时间: 2005-9-5 04:08
eyeq is a useful software for improving reading speed.

But I think LSAT test your reading detail more than just speed.



For reading reference other than LSAT, I'd recommend
Economist,Nation,Science and Editorial's review from NY times,Washinton
Post.(update everyday and free for read for 1 week)


作者: chelseayang    时间: 2005-10-9 02:18

Sorry for this late reply. A little busy with my application


For the reading on philosophy, i don't have any preference. I simply went to the philosphy section in the library,and picked up a couple of books.


I didn't read anything particular on economics either. i read novels, magazines,and newspaper most of the time. for magazine, i recommend the Economist, Time. for newspaper, the New York Times, the Walstreet Journal. Read them when you get tired of test questions.The novels i read came from used book stores


I never tried any speed reading software. so i have no idea about that.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-9 2:19:50编辑过]

作者: LRzealot    时间: 2005-10-12 11:49

我觉得Time和Business Week有点不正式,不学究。。。


北京大学出版社有一个影印版本的西方哲学教材。当当上有


都是名家: Kant, John Locke, 修莫。。。等



Economist 很好。


请教 chelseayang : 请问 powerscore 推荐的


American History Literature 怎么样呢?Popular Science, 和 Scientific American 呢?



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-12 20:12:42编辑过]

作者: 木馨    时间: 2005-10-12 20:24
以下是引用LRzealot在2005-10-12 11:49:00的发言:

请教 chelseayang : 请问 powerscore 推荐的


American History Literature 怎么样呢?Popular Science, 和 Scientific American 呢?






前者(American History Literature)是书吧?好象相同名字的书籍有好多,作者、出版社也很多。LRzealot 指的是?

后两个杂志(Popular Science 和 Scientific American)每期都挺厚的。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-12 20:45:11编辑过]

作者: chelseayang    时间: 2005-10-20 09:20
i like Scientific American
作者: history    时间: 2006-10-30 20:44
time 的review 文章还是不错的。
其他杂志都太贵了。





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3