标题: OG13-SC-41 [打印本页] 作者: Etoile- 时间: 2017-8-5 10:29 标题: OG13-SC-41 In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.
A arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
B arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
C a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights
D a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights
E a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
纠结的是B为什么不能做结果状语来理解？
作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2017-8-6 21:11
B中 for equal political ad legal rights for women 修饰不明，可以修饰a treatise 也可以理解成用来修饰arguing. 所以错作者: sunjie12389 时间: 2017-8-6 21:59
感觉到题，还是用同位语从句更为合理
虽然从语法角度上讲感觉B没啥问题，arguing 虽然不能表示结果，但是也可以理解为修饰那个人啊，但是后面的 in a treatise 好像就变得和前面Discourse on Women 不是一个东西了，所以觉得E更好吧。
个人感觉，请大家批评作者: Etoile- 时间: 2017-8-7 15:54
