ChaseDream
标题: 请教一个曼哈顿上的例子 [打印本页]
作者: 小渔村人 时间: 2017-8-2 04:30
标题: 请教一个曼哈顿上的例子
原文如下（6th ed. p67）：
Sentences such as the following are common in speech, but they are weong in writing:
Wrong: Crime has recently decreased in our neighbourhood, WHICH has led to a rise in propetry values.
The recently decreased in crime has led to a rise in property values, but decreased is a verb in the stence. Whenever you use which, you must be referring to a noun. Here the neighbourhood has not led to anything, nor crime it self. Remember the rule:
Use WHICH only to refer to nouns -----never to refer to an entire claus.
然后它还给了个正确的例子：Crime has recently decreased in our neighbourhood, leading to a rise in propetry values.
首先我不明白的是，which不能指代之前的一整句话吗？那么我之前学的有关非限定性定语从句的知识就都是错的了。而且我人在英国，当地人他们说which的指代实际上是按需要来的……
另外关于那个正确的例子，我看过CD上面一个帖子http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1113732-1-1.html也提到过：
“Crime has recently decreased in our neighborhood, leading to a rise in property prices.
if you have to assign responsibility/causality to a THING, then that thing is ... crime, which caused the rise in property values by decreasing.
所以，现在分词的动作和主语make sense并不是说要主语就要是动作的发出者，而是主语要对现在分词的这个结果负责。我要对吓到狗狗负责，犯罪要对财产价值的上升负责（通过下降），因为是犯罪的改变导致的财产价值的上升。”
好像和曼哈顿的说法矛盾了，那么犯罪到底能不能对财产升值负责呢？
请各位大神指点，谢谢！
作者: yuskisw 时间: 2017-8-2 06:02
第一句话已经说了，common in speech, but they are weong in writing
你还引用“英国当地人”的说法
考GMAT就要有GMAT的思路。
GMAT经常考which指代，需要和前面的名字或者代词离的很近，这就是"GMAT correct"
通俗怎么说 口语怎么说doesn't matter
作者: 小渔村人 时间: 2017-8-2 06:27
谢谢！
其实曼哈顿里也说了GMAT官方在写题目的时候也会犯这样的错误……
我比较在意的是第二个问题，不知道这个中间的逻辑到底应该是什么……
作者: yuskisw 时间: 2017-8-2 06:37
硬撸逻辑的话是可以负责的。
如果这句话改成
Our neighborhood has seen crime decreased, leading...
主语变成our neighborhood，可能就不太对了，因为neighborhood不是原因。Crime是原因。
个人见解
作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2017-8-2 08:10
Comma Ving 的一个修饰comma 前的整个clause, comma Ving其中的一个用法表示是前面那个clause 的直接的结果. 这个RON在视频里有讲过，建议楼主去整理下 comma Ving 的各种情况的用法就明白了。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |