标题: 关于Ving的修饰问题！！ [打印本页] 作者: 曾豆仁 时间: 2017-7-6 15:40 标题: 关于Ving的修饰问题！！ OG17 682题 A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne’s fictional Phileas Fogg.
(A) A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included
(B) The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
(C) Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the
(D) Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly’s exploits are
(E) The pioneer journalist’s exploits of Nellie Bly included
答案是B，我是没有问题的。主要是OG解释里面，关于C的解释它说： The wording of this version is illogical because it makes Nellie Bly the subject of the verb including.？？？？？？这里的inclding不应该修饰的是journalist，根据就近修饰名词啊。如果它修饰的是主语，作为伴随动作，他不是应该加个逗号吗？？？？
OE大概看看就好了，有很多问题。建议还是找instructor的解释来看。作者: 曾豆仁 时间: 2017-7-6 15:48
求回复求回复求回复T.T作者: 曾豆仁 时间: 2017-7-6 19:44
而且这种情况还有，OG 686题
686.Unlike the nests of leaf cuttersand most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider antsmake a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form “curtains” of antsthat hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and thecolony larvae and pupae
A.the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
B.the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
C.leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
D. leafcutters and most other ants in having nests
E.those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests
答案对D的解释是(D) This sentence correctly compares leaf cutters and other ants with raider ants, but the prepositional phrase in having nests suggests that it is raider ants, not leaf cutters and most other ants, that have nests situated underground or in pieces of wood; however, the rest of the sentence indicates that in fact raider ants’ nests are not situated in such locations.
也是Ving不就近修饰，而是修饰主语？？？？为什么？？？求大牛指导！！！！作者: 曾豆仁 时间: 2017-7-6 19:48