ChaseDream

标题: 几天后一战,几道题目请教 【急】 [打印本页]

作者: hybaihuan    时间: 2017-6-30 17:32
标题: 几天后一战,几道题目请教 【急】

Q1 Although she had been known as an effective legislator first in the Texas Senate and later in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1974 was she made a nationally recognized figure, as it was televised nationwide.



答案是B,解释为“which were”中的which指代hearings
我的疑问是:这个hearings离着which好远,中间有好几个名词了,impeachment, President Richard Nixon (当然which不可能指人),为什么可以指代hearings?
楼主当初选C,回顾一下是不是错在:with her participation....., 这样Barbara Jordan必须做主语,而不可以说“it was not until 1974 that Barbara Jordan....”?

Q2 The diet of the ordinary Greek in classical times was largely vegetarian-vegetables, fresh cheese, oatmeal, and meal cakes, and meat rarely.
(A) and meat rarely
(B) and meat was rare
(C) with meat as rare
(D) meat a rarity
(E) with meat as a raity
答案是E, 这里的comma+with修饰的是之前整个clause对吗?
我选的D,当初感觉这是独立主格,meat + (be) + a rarity, n.+ n.形式, 请问哪里不对呢?

Q3 另外想确认一下A of B的问题, 根据很多CD帖子总结出来的规律,不知对不对:
A of B,which: which可以指代A或B
A of B that: that 可以指代A或B
A of B, 同位语:同位语可以指代A或B
A of B, Ving, +主语+谓语: Ving 修饰A
A of B, with: with如果修饰preceding noun, 是A吗?这个不是很清楚

求解答!! 谢谢!



作者: fxxxfxxx    时间: 2017-6-30 18:01
1. 因为Which 是复数形式 (were), 所以不能指代单数名词,也不能指人,所以可以指代hearings。
C错就是因为which was, 这里which只能指代impeachment, 当然肯定不能指代复数的hearings。
with her participation 和 这个人是否是主语无关啊,her不是一定要指代主语的。

2. 是的
如果像你说的,这里也没有meat修饰的对象吧。

3. which只能指代前面最近的语法合理的修饰对象,就像Q1里那样。 that比较宽泛,指代对象视句意而定。
同位语的话要看句意,如果是作为修饰名词只能修饰最近的名词,不能跳跃。
comma + ing 修饰前面句子的subject 和 verb
comma + with 一般也是修饰前面的subject 和verb,就像第二题那样。我不太清楚是不是可以修饰名词,感觉是不可以。





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3