作者: BuffyK 时间: 2017-6-29 09:15
感觉和楼主的思维方式不同，没有分析果因还是因果。只有C选择才与题目相关。
Facts: K steelmakers become less competitive due to imported steel with low price.
international treaties banned subsidizing steel industries by foreign governments
anyway, workers in K steel industry is going to suffer
Conclusion: to protect industrial employment and steel companies, the government should limit cheap steel imports.
to weaken the argument, new reason or fact should be stated
A. the whole argument is about K steel industry is hurt by cheap imports. the fact that K export is not competitive is not relevant to the conclusion
B Penalties of Violation is not relevant to the conclusion
C Correct. if import of cheap steel is limited, then many industries will suffer according, making industrial employment worse.
D It reiterates the facts in some way-as we have already known the foreign steel is cheap. to explain a fact is not weaken conclusion
E wages difference here is not relevant to the conclusion.