请各位大大帮帮我吧 我搞不懂 OG的解释 为什么 E不对呢
6. Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth Through vents in the ocean floor.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
A. The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.
B. Bacteria are able to exist at eh molten center of the Eargh.
C. A through survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
D. Life probably exist on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.
E. Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacterial had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.
Answer:C This statement properly uses the existence of the microbes far below the land's surface and of the bacterial far below the ocean's surface to draw a general conclusion about the potential existence of life below the surface of a planet.
A,B,E. The conclusion must include both microbes and bacteria.
D. The passage provides no evidence about comets to lead to this conclusion.
这是个归纳题,结论是 Not all life depends on energy from sunlight,后面是两个支持的例子,我个人认为E不对是因为E只提到了一个事实,而且是从题干中的某个例子得出的.而归纳题一般应该是包含题目中的总体信息,要么是conclusion,infer,或imply,而不是选一个支持题干的例子.
Thanks!让我再琢磨琢磨,看来是我没搞清楚问题
请各位大大帮帮我吧 我搞不懂 OG的解释 为什么 E不对呢
6. Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth Through vents in the ocean floor.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
A. The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.
B. Bacteria are able to exist at eh molten center of the Eargh.
C. A through survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.
D. Life probably exist on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and frozen gases.
E. Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacterial had been feeding on substances that had not been produced from the energy of sunlight.
Answer:C This statement properly uses the existence of the microbes far below the land's surface and of the bacterial far below the ocean's surface to draw a general conclusion about the potential existence of life below the surface of a planet.
A,B,E. The conclusion must include both microbes and bacteria.
D. The passage provides no evidence about comets to lead to this conclusion.
E，在煤和石油中发现了细菌的残骸，并不表示细菌曾经在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质，也可能是细菌“生前”的时候就是在吃太阳能量产生的物质，而死了以后被埋到了地下、现在和煤、石油一起。
换一种说法，假如在煤和石油中发现了秦始皇的残骸，也并不表示秦始皇曾经在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质。道理是一样的。
所以，E错。
E选项的迷惑就在于：bacteria和bacterial remains是两码事，一个是活生生的东东（题干中提到的就是这种还活的东东），另一个是死翘翘的东东（在E选项中）。
再说明白一点，假如说，现在，我们在煤和石油中发现了秦始皇，那就一定表示秦始皇在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质。。。呵呵。。。
在这里，假如把E项改成bacteria而不是bacterial remains，那么E的推理就对了。但是尽管如此，E想要成为本题的一个结论，还是不行。因为E选项不是归纳出来的一个结论，而更象是演绎出来的一个例子。
所以，根据以上种种原因，打死也不能选E。
那为什么正确答案是C呢，怎么扯到一个行星没有生命上，不是与题目中无关吗？？？
谢谢。
E，在煤和石油中发现了细菌的残骸，并不表示细菌曾经在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质，也可能是细菌“生前”的时候就是在吃太阳能量产生的物质，而死了以后被埋到了地下、现在和煤、石油一起。
换一种说法，假如在煤和石油中发现了秦始皇的残骸，也并不表示秦始皇曾经在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质。道理是一样的。
所以，E错。
E选项的迷惑就在于：bacteria和bacterial remains是两码事，一个是活生生的东东（题干中提到的就是这种还活的东东），另一个是死翘翘的东东（在E选项中）。
再说明白一点，假如说，现在，我们在煤和石油中发现了秦始皇，那就一定表示秦始皇在吃不是太阳能量产生的物质。。。呵呵。。。
在这里，假如把E项改成bacteria而不是bacterial remains，那么E的推理就对了。但是尽管如此，E想要成为本题的一个结论，还是不行。因为E选项不是归纳出来的一个结论，而更象是演绎出来的一个例子。
所以，根据以上种种原因，打死也不能选E。
太经典啦！
佩服佩服！
那为什么答案是C呢？
难道是:not all life depends on energy from sunlight-->not all life lives on the surface of earth-->C选项?
请NN指教！
这是个归纳题,结论是 Not all life depends on energy from sunlight,后面是两个支持的例子,我个人认为E不对是因为E只提到了一个事实,而且是从题干中的某个例子得出的.而归纳题一般应该是包含题目中的总体信息,要么是conclusion,infer,或imply,而不是选一个支持题干的例子.
可不可以理解为此归纳题，已经有了结论，选项中直接找从结论能imply的内容即可呢？ 后面支持的例子只是加强题意的理解，却不应该和选项有关呢？
A through survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life
大家帮我翻译一下这个句子吧,卡在 beyong a doubt 上了,谢谢大家
A through survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life
大家帮我翻译一下这个句子吧,卡在 beyong a doubt 上了,谢谢大家
beyond a doubt 毫不怀疑
我看到OG11逻辑分类非Lawyer版认为，此题术语加强题。其实应该是归纳题，对吧？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |