Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in
rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the
area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama
sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's
explanation?
(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
(E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
作者: Fiona09 时间: 2017-3-22 14:39
这道题经常被讨论，楼主可以参考下：http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-507128-1-1.html作者: lisiberry 时间: 2017-3-22 22:45
Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993.作者: Helicene 时间: 2017-3-23 02:14
谢谢,的确很有帮助！ 没有考古 直接发问了 my bad作者: MFEJared 时间: 2017-3-23 03:45
"in addition to renting videos, ALSO SOLD THEM CHEAPLY." To weaken Brad's objection means to strengthen Jennifer's argument that the decline is because of the opening of Videorama. E is the only reason could explain Jennifer's logic.