Maize contains the vitamin niacin, but not in a form the body can absorb.  ellagra is a disease that results from niacin deficiency. When maize was introduced into southern Europe from the Americas in the eighteenth century, it quickly became a dietary staple, and many Europeans who came to subsist primarily on maize developed pellagra.  ellagra was virtually unknown at that time in the Americas, however, even among people who subsisted primarily on maize.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the contrasting incidence of pellagra described above?
我选了E啊
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
我选了D,答案是E
明明D项排除了他因,可以加强啊
楼主,不同的题目请每题单独成贴发问。此外,请在标题里注明题目出处和题号,方便大家查询。谢谢支持!
发帖格式请参照置顶贴:
【发帖必读】GMAT逻辑区格式和搜索 [ 2 3 4]
选C
E. 在发现pellagra与niacin有关之前,pellagra被认为是一种传染病。
并不能解释为什么欧洲人和美洲人同样吃玉米,而欧洲人缺患上pellagra。
2. 一个十六世纪的英国探险家,从k岛上取得了高金含量的土壤样本。由于高金含量被报道,elizabeth赞助了两个采矿探险队,但都没有发现金子。现代的分析指出k岛的土壤金含量很低。因此用于测定frobisher的样本金含量的方法是不准确的。
D取非 frobisher有从其他岛上取得的含金土壤样本。
而Elizabeth去的是k岛,得出低金含量的结论。用现代方法重新检测的样本和frobisher的样本完全是两种。对其他岛上的样本的检测结果可能是准确的也可能是不准确的。不能削弱结论。
E 取非 在检测之前frobisher在样本中添加了金子。说明f的样本不是原始样本,检测的结果是准确的。削弱结论。
楼上的大侠,谢谢相助啊
就是还有一点不懂,Pellagra was virtually unknown at that time in the Americas........., 这里的不为美洲人所知,意思就是在美洲没有人得Pellagra这个病吗?我原以为不为所知就是美洲人也得这个病,却不知道病因是什么,不知道与玉米有关。
"我原以为不为所知就是美洲人也得这个病,却不知道病因是什么,不知道与玉米有关。"
如果这样理解:就不应该说“even among people who subsisted primarily on maize.”而是“even among famous doctors....."了吧?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |