标题: Two Kaplan CRs [打印本页] 作者: braveMBA 时间: 2003-8-28 01:14 标题: Two Kaplan CRs [attachimg]3178[/attachimg]
说SC不支持REDUCE THE BENIFIT PACKAGE ，DOES ALLOW IMPROVEMENT。3，为何不对？如果G不可能VETO，则就不会成为OBSTACLE。作者: albert 时间: 2003-8-28 02:42
3 is correct,right? 作者: braveMBA 时间: 2003-8-28 02:47
YES，4为何？作者: albert 时间: 2003-8-28 02:59
there are 2 factors could,possibly, lead to the failure of new plan...
by eliminate one factor(the assumption, 3), then the only bossible factor is the other one..
we don't care whether the other one is possibe.. even if the other one is not possible, the line of reasoning is correct...作者: johnson_zhang 时间: 2003-8-28 16:19
I have the same problem when testing for Kaplan. After careful thought, I knew that the reason why I choose the wrong option is that I understand the 1st sentence wrongly.
"it" in the 1st sentence doesn't refer to State Constituion, but refer to Legislature. So you can get the evidence "State Constituion and Legislature allow improvment of package" and conclusion "Only govenor doesn't support the new pension program". The assumption is surely 3.
4 is wrong cause it's the conclusion.
Hope explain clearly.作者: braveMBA 时间: 2003-8-29 11:04
Thanks for your explanation. But I do think 'it' represents State Constitution. Now I am clear. The argument gives us clue that the only obstacle of new program is the possibility that governor will probably veto the program, so there must be a premise that State Constitution will support the program, or the program will definitely be fail. Am I right?作者: johnson_zhang 时间: 2003-8-29 11:43
Yeah, you are right. "it" refers to State Constitution...