ChaseDream

标题: OG16-114 关于Ved修饰的问题，求解答 [打印本页]

作者: dding1 时间: 2016-11-24 12:00
标题: OG16-114 关于Ved修饰的问题，求解答

Construction of the Roman Colosseum, which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, began in A.D. 69. during the reign of Vespasian, was completed a decade later, during the reign of Titus, who opened the Colosseum with a one-hundred-day cycle of religious pageants, gladiatorial games, and spectacles.

(A) which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, began in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian,
(B) officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and
(C) which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, began in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and
(D) officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater and begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian it
(E) officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, which was begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and
C 是正确答案，也看了很多之前的贴，但有点搞晕了。
疑问在B中，如果我们不看句意，单独看修饰
1、 known as the Flavian Amphitheater 这个modifer修饰的是the Roman Colosseum吧，那begun 是否可以认为是在修饰 Flavian Amhpitheater(别看句意，光看修饰), 我脑子里一直将Ved作为修饰最近的名词看的，这错么？
2、A of B, Ved的模式是否和A of B, which的模式一样？用Ron的话说，就是 if you have "which" following "noun1 + preposition + noun2", then "which" can refer to noun1 only if noun2 is grammatically ineligible. otherwise it automatically refers to noun2

多谢

作者: GMAT♠ASSASSIN 时间: 2016-11-24 12:36
1. Nope. If you were going to view "begun" as noun modifier modifying Flavian Amhpitheater, then you will need "and" between " known as..." and "begun".

2. That will be same, since " ved" is also part of noun modifer.

作者: dding1 时间: 2016-11-24 13:01

GMAT♠ASSASSIN 发表于 2016-11-24 12:36
1. Nope. If you were going to view "begun" as noun modifier modifying Flavian Amhpitheater, then you ...

了解你说的问题2了。钻牛角尖在问一下：
1.如果在两个modifer之间加了and:岂不是两个modifer: officially known as the FA 和 begun 都是修饰 Roman Colosseum了？
2.如果就是不加and,是不是可以认为修饰的就是FA？
多谢回答

作者: GMAT♠ASSASSIN 时间: 2016-11-24 13:13

dding1 发表于 2016-11-24 13:01
了解你说的问题2了。钻牛角尖在问一下：
1.如果在两个modifer之间加了and:岂不是两个modifer: officially ...

1. Yep. But the meaning will be illogical, since begun should be used to describe the construction .

2. You should use the meaning to judge. The problem here is that begun should be began to pair with its logical subject " construction"

作者: dding1 时间: 2016-11-24 14:05

GMAT♠ASSASSIN 发表于 2016-11-24 13:13
1. Yep. But the meaning will be illogical, since begun should be used to describe the construction ...

谢谢回答
1 我确定了
2 明白你说的句意问题，我其实就是想知道ved是不是不会存在ving的情况，跳跃修饰前面的主语，根据你的回答，应该是不会了。多谢

作者: GMAT♠ASSASSIN 时间: 2016-11-24 15:00

dding1 发表于 2016-11-24 14:05
谢谢回答
1 我确定了
2 明白你说的句意问题，我其实就是想知道ved是不是不会存在ving的情况，跳跃修饰前 ...

2. when it comes to noun modifier, ving and ved are vitrtually the same.

they can both refer the noun1 or the noun 2 in the structure " noun1 + prep + noun2", but the judgement will be boiled down to the meaning.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)