ChaseDream

标题: GMAT 语法 OG16 SC #136# 求大神指导 讨论 [打印本页]

作者: 我要考过GMAT    时间: 2016-10-29 10:41
标题: GMAT 语法 OG16 SC #136# 求大神指导 讨论
136. A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicated in its  such as glass oil-lamp fragments, found at the site.
(A) A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicated in its eastward orientation and by its overall plan, as well as
(B) A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, once probably being a church, was indicated by its eastward orientation, overall plan, and
(C) Indicating that a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church were its eastward orientation and overall plan, but also the
(D) A ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church, as indicates its eastward orientation and overall plan, as well as the
(E) That a ruined structure found at Aqaba, Jordan, was probably a church is indicated by its eastward orientation and overall plan, as well as by the

根据OG官方的讲解和一些网站上的讲解, 我已经知道为什么要选E答案,但是我不理解的是:
1.OG 选项D的解释:
D The only plausible subject for the singular verb indicates is the plural orientation . . . plan, as well as the artifacts. Very little about this sentence makes sense.  他的意思是说indicates  的主语是 the plural orientation . . . plan, as well as the artifacts.   为什么啊?? 难道不应该是 a ruined structure ?

2.OG解释  (That a ruined structure was probably . . .) followed by a passive verb (is indicated), followed by the prepositional phrase (by . . .), which is completed by a parallel listing of forms of evidence,   那么  eastward orientation , its overall plan ,  artifacts,  应该平行     为什么选项E by its eastward orientation and overall plan, as well as by the中 overall plan 前面不加 介词 by  



求大神讲解,也希望有想法的G友可以分享一下思路!

共同努力!  共勉


作者: 陈陈陈要过gmat    时间: 2017-9-19 20:51
同求!
作者: 你最珍贵187    时间: 2017-12-16 10:56
D里,indicates是as引导的从句里面的谓语动词,这个从句是一个倒装,主语是eastward orientation and plan,as well as artifacts,所以谓语要用复数形式。其次,当as引导伴随或者原因从句时,从句要是一个完整的句子。这里的as从句里,主干是orientation and plan, as well as artifacts indicates,不make sense,他indicate啥了,你压根说不清楚啊。
E里的平行是这样的:by orientation and (by)plans, as well as by the artifacts.  plan的介词因为跟前面的介词一样所以省略了。artifacts的by 为啥没省,是因为artifacts被as well as隔开,是另一个跟plan,orientation平行的evidence,如果省略的话会造成歧义。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3