ChaseDream

标题: Manhattan里的两个问题一直不懂 [打印本页]

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-20 11:16
标题: Manhattan里的两个问题一直不懂
Manhattan PREP 里有两道语法题我不是特别明白，请教大神解答困惑！
1.Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region whose most famous export is the wine which bears its name.

answer: which should be changed to that, the explanation in the book: the context of this sentence calls for an essential clause to modify the wine, since the point of the clause is to identify the wine. if the sentence ended with the wine, it would be incomplete. the clause should therefore begin with that rather than which.

which前面没有逗号啊，是essentisl clause啊，为啥非要改成that?

2.Between 1998 and 2003, there was heavy fightling in Parthia among numerous armed factions yet this conflict, so much more complicated than a conventional war between two states, involved no fewer than eight countries and twenty-fiive militias.

answer: yet should be changed to a semicolon (;), the explanation in the book: yet is illogical because the aciton in the second clause (this conflict...militias) did not happen despite the action in the first clause (between ... factions), as a word such as yet suggests.

没看懂这个解释。
用；我能理解， semicolon connects two independent clause, and is often followed by a transition expression, such as howerver.
但是，FANBOYS 中的yet是 “但是，然而” 的意思吧？所以这个地方是不是应该可以用 comma + yet ？链接两个complete sentence，同时表转折？

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-21 22:09
自己顶

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-22 10:42

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-26 09:17
5555555555

作者: vi.len 时间: 2016-8-26 10:48
第一题关于限制性定语从句，好像在哪看到过，GMAT中的限制性定语从句都不可以用which引导
第二题如果用YET翻译过来是“这有一场战争，然而这场冲突很复杂”会比较没有逻辑性吧。YET表转折，前后部分冲突。有没有战争和战争复不复杂没有什么冲突啊。

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-30 06:58

vi.len 发表于 2016-8-26 10:48
第一题关于限制性定语从句，好像在哪看到过，GMAT中的限制性定语从句都不可以用which引导
第二题如果用YET ...

啊？限制性定语从句不能用which引导？？？

作者: vi.len 时间: 2016-8-30 18:30

SeanF 发表于 2016-8-30 06:58
啊？限制性定语从句不能用which引导？？？

恩

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-8-30 19:04

vi.len 发表于 2016-8-30 18:30
恩

多谢！！！

作者: 推嫂 时间: 2016-8-30 23:50
第一题
我觉得这个应该是那个essential clause的关系，在八十多页专门讲了曼哈顿自己的理解，最后说
However, the GMAT has acknowledged that this whichlthat differentiation is controversial,
so the GMAT is unlikely to make this distinction the make-or-break issue for any answer
choice.
所以我觉得这个which that 应该没神马影响

作者: 周尼玛是神 时间: 2016-9-1 22:17
啊哈哈哈哈哈楼主你的问题真的和我有疑问的一毛一样啊哈哈哈

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-9-7 14:05

推嫂发表于 2016-8-30 23:50
第一题
我觉得这个应该是那个essential clause的关系，在八十多页专门讲了曼哈顿自己的理解，最后说
Howeve ...

谢谢你啦~

作者: SeanF 时间: 2016-9-7 19:49

周尼玛是神发表于 2016-9-1 22:17
啊哈哈哈哈哈楼主你的问题真的和我有疑问的一毛一样啊哈哈哈

哈哈哈哈

作者: 锕儍 时间: 2016-9-8 11:00
我也觉得第一句话关键是which在GMAT中一般引导非限定性，而that必须是限定性定从，不过用这个作为排除方法还是要谨慎。
第二句话好像不存在转折的意思吧，所以用yet不对，改成一个分号，作用和and差不多。

作者: 狐狸狐狸 时间: 2018-10-2 20:04
楼主的问题和我的也一模一样......都2018年了，还被困扰着...

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)