ChaseDream

标题: 关于being的总结，结合OG题目和RON大神在论坛里的发言 [打印本页]

作者: 油闹家 时间: 2016-7-29 17:09
标题: 关于being的总结，结合OG题目和RON大神在论坛里的发言
根据不完全统计，在OG16所有语法题目里面，目前只有一个题目的选项出现了奇怪的being~
根据以往经验，看到being都是秒杀有木有？？？

但就是有例外，因此，单纯的不假思索的删掉含有being的选项已经不那么靠谱了~

这道题出现在OG16的110题里，比较靠后，但我感觉因为GMAC那帮老头摸清楚了大家的解题思路

，所以更倾向于把正确的选项里加上being~
废话不多说，上题！

Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past,  makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of  incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

E为正确选项，长的很恶，有木有？
但人家就是正确的又怎样？

先把另外几个选项的错误根据RON大神和OG解释，来删一遍！
首先，弄清楚文章想表达的意思：
This sentence explains that an executive who is blindly committed to a proven
course of action is likely to overlook or misinterpret indicators that the plan may
no longer be working. The sentence needs to make clear who may misinterpret
these indicators.
也就是说excutive盲目的采用以往的xx已经是不行啦，因为这可能导致他们忽视一些错误，因为以往的xx已经不再有效了。

A。Heavy commitment byan executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in thepast, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret themwhen they do appear.

"heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action"is awkward and difficult to read. (you may have to be a native speaker to pickup on this, though)  much moreimportantly: * makes it likely to miss... this doesn't work. technically, thiswould mean that "it" - an unspecified entity - is likely to miss thesigns. if you use the "it is ADJ..." construction, and the verb has aspecific subject, you MUST include that subject in the construction. it islikely that the executive will miss...

B。Anexecutive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one thatworked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpretingones likely when they do appear.

notice that you have a sentencethat says that the executivehim/herself makes missing thesigns likely.

"misinterpreting ones" is also wrong. thisshould be "them", not "ones".

这个B相当有迷惑性啊啊啊！但是后来仔细一看，B想表达的意思居然居然是An executive makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear
后面的D也犯了这个错误。
C。An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to missor misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially ifit has worked well in the past.
'it' is ambiguous, becauseit could potentially refer either to 'course of action' (the intendedantecedent) or to 'incipient trouble'. also note that grammatical parallelismdoesn't help: both of those possible antecedents areobjects of prepositions - neither is the subject of its own clause (which wouldthereby create parallelism with 'it', which is the subject of its clause).

(D)Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it hasworked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient troubleor misinterpreting them when they do appear.

Misinterpreting should be an infinitive verb form to parallel miss; thephrasing throughout the sentence is wordy and awkward.

所以说，你艰难的排除了四个不靠谱的选型以后，只剩下了E.Beingheavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well inthe past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble ormisinterpret them when they do appear.
这个句子真的是好不清纯好做作，看上去就和外面的妖艳贱货一样呢！

但没办法！这就是正确的选项！
首先，句子表意正确，指代正确，没有语法错误！
特别注意，在这里Being heavily committed to a course of action就相当于整个句子的主语，将句子主谓连起来Being heavily committed to a course of actionis likely to …………灰常完整，虽然看起来很变扭！

所以，根据RON大神总结~~~（敲黑板）
为了福利更多同学，以下内容回复吧~~

作者: Fiona09 时间: 2016-7-29 18:16

LZ太有心了，谢谢分享~~

作者: Nievesma 时间: 2016-7-29 20:36
感谢分享！

作者: kennichan2011 时间: 2016-8-4 23:55
很好支持........

作者: Aczxx 时间: 2016-8-5 14:18
thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: WJWJWJWJ 时间: 2016-8-5 15:21
！！！！！！！！！

作者: larochelle 时间: 2016-8-5 16:15
Mark一下！

作者: chueng 时间: 2016-8-6 10:29

作者: elisepoon 时间: 2016-8-6 11:38
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

作者: elisepoon 时间: 2016-8-6 11:52
之前对being的知识点感觉挺清晰的，但是感觉最近想多了有点迷惑，lz这个帖子有帮助到！

不过还有些疑惑点想和lz探讨下，贴一下Ron之前关于being的回复：

1. "being" should NEVER be used to express description or equivalence. in other words, if you're saying that X is Y, where X is a noun (thing or person) and Y is either another noun or a description, you should NOT use "being".
2. from what we've seen, "being" can be ok as long as at least one of the following 2 conditions obtains:

(1) it is part of a PASSIVE-VOICE construction (note that such constructions require a form of "to be", so, if the passive voice is in the -ing form, that form will manifest as "being");

or
(2) it is used as a GERUND (i.e., the action of "being something" is treated as a NOUN in the sentence).

想知道怎么才算是description？是不是只要做定语，用being就wordy？比如OG13 #49

The automotive conveyor-belt system, which Henry Ford modeled after an assembly-line technique introduced by Ransom Olds, reduced from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T.
(A) from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T
(B) the time being required to assemble a Model T, from a day and a half down to 93 minutes
(C) the time being required to assemble a Model T, a day and a half to 93 minutes
(D)  the time required to assemble a Model T from a day and a half to 93 minutes  (Key: D)
(E) from a day and a half to 93 minutes, the time required for the assembling of a Model T

这里的being required是不是就是Ron说的“be used to express description”？可是又怎么理解说的“it is part of passive-voice construction”可以用being呢？being required这里确实也是属于passive-voice construction啊。

可能自己被这点绕晕了，希望有明眼人指出。谢谢XD

作者: isa蝈蝈 时间: 2016-8-6 15:40
同意！

作者: barbie20100303 时间: 2016-8-6 15:55
顶楼主~~~~~~

作者: ccp92 时间: 2016-8-6 17:50
看一下！

作者: aplor 时间: 2016-8-6 18:35
谢谢想看看

作者: LM想想 时间: 2016-8-6 18:39
11111111111

作者: cwk123212 时间: 2016-8-6 22:45
号

作者: alexnovia 时间: 2016-8-7 08:50
thx for sharing~

作者: ai559031 时间: 2016-8-7 09:36
看一下！

作者: naon 时间: 2016-8-7 10:53
看一下！

作者: Bug君。 时间: 2016-8-7 12:07
感谢LZ分享~

作者: StrawsonD 时间: 2016-8-7 16:27
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

作者: 林昭苏 时间: 2016-8-7 17:38

thx for sharing

作者: 左胖要一次搞定 时间: 2016-8-8 01:34
同意！

作者: Crystal_Chai 时间: 2016-8-8 02:04
看一下！

作者: luoyiruoyi 时间: 2016-8-8 06:47
haohaoahoahaoaho

作者: GMAT妥妥 时间: 2016-8-8 15:05
膜拜ron

作者: louislau01 时间: 2016-8-8 16:47
同意！

作者: Onlylovezy 时间: 2016-8-9 10:13
haohaohao

作者: Jessicafeng 时间: 2016-8-9 12:08
同意！

作者: 络腮虎子 时间: 2016-8-9 15:04
Mark一下！

作者: 邵方彦 时间: 2016-8-9 15:42
我也被这题暗算了

作者: 渣渣要考gmat 时间: 2016-8-9 21:15
看一下！

作者: Friendlyhead 时间: 2016-8-9 22:57
看一下！

作者: KyleMao 时间: 2016-8-10 00:06
thx thx thx thx thx

作者: qian_first 时间: 2016-8-10 00:08
Mark一下！

作者: kathyya 时间: 2016-8-10 14:36
xiexie

作者: AmorFati820 时间: 2016-8-10 14:58
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

作者: wlyaiesec 时间: 2016-8-10 16:39
看一下！

作者: 读你 时间: 2016-8-10 17:22
感谢分享！

作者: 石榴十六 时间: 2016-8-10 19:21
Mark一下！

作者: 油闹家 时间: 2016-8-10 19:24

石榴十六发表于 2016-8-10 19:21
Mark一下！

那个……不好意思问一下：石榴粉？

作者: 石榴十六 时间: 2016-8-10 20:11
一不小心被楼主翻牌喽，不是粉啦，单纯用惯了

作者: 油闹家 时间: 2016-8-10 20:45

石榴十六发表于 2016-8-10 20:11
一不小心被楼主翻牌喽，不是粉啦，单纯用惯了

2333333,我还以为是石榴粉呐，你这个名字nice~

作者: babychubear 时间: 2016-8-10 21:29
Mark一下！

作者: 小方块 时间: 2016-8-10 23:50
Mark一下！

作者: claudialeee 时间: 2016-8-11 08:46
Mark一下！

作者: lala1418 时间: 2016-8-11 09:55
感谢！！

作者: hyh189 时间: 2016-8-11 11:19
Mark一下！

作者: 石榴十六 时间: 2016-8-11 16:16

油闹家发表于 2016-8-10 20:45
2333333,我还以为是石榴粉呐，你这个名字nice~

哈哈哈哈，谢谢家家

作者: jumean 时间: 2016-8-12 17:29
谢谢楼主！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: 明溪竹子 时间: 2016-8-12 17:41
Mark一下！

作者: Yzwaqangel 时间: 2016-8-12 17:52
Mark一下！

作者: OasisTseng 时间: 2016-8-12 19:52
Mmmmm

作者: squadron 时间: 2016-8-12 20:39
多谢大神！

作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2016-8-12 22:32
感谢分享！

作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2016-8-12 22:36
多谢楼主分享RON 大神的分析。但是不是很明白为啥省略了being 句子就不是完整的主语了？懵逼脸，能否分析下，谢谢！

作者: wangheyao 时间: 2016-8-12 23:01
Mark一下！

作者: wangheyao 时间: 2016-8-12 23:41

emmahiggins09 发表于 2016-8-12 22:36
多谢楼主分享RON 大神的分析。但是不是很明白为啥省略了being 句子就不是完整的主语了？懵逼脸，能否分析 ...

因为动名词可以做主语，由其构成的短语可以做主语。如果没有就没有名词可以做主语了。比如swimming is my favourite sport. swimming就是动名词做主语

作者: wangheyao 时间: 2016-8-12 23:42
想问一下前面加being那是不是就变成了被动语态，这样语义还对吗？

作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2016-8-12 23:48

wangheyao 发表于 2016-8-12 23:41
因为动名词可以做主语，由其构成的短语可以做主语。如果没有就没有名词可以做主语了。比如swimming is my ...

我个人不觉的这里 being 是动名词的形式。觉得就是个助动词的分词形式，但是我觉得助动词的分词形式可以省略啊，表被动的话过去分词commited 就可以表示过去和被动了，求楼主指点迷经

作者: wangheyao 时间: 2016-8-12 23:54

emmahiggins09 发表于 2016-8-12 23:48
我个人不觉的这里 being 是动名词的形式。觉得就是个助动词的分词形式，但是我觉得助动词的分词形式可以 ...

being省略了那后面is的主语在哪里。。总要是名词或是名词短语做主语吧

作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2016-8-12 23:57

wangheyao 发表于 2016-8-12 23:54
being省略了那后面is的主语在哪里。。总要是名词或是名词短语做主语吧

呃不是很明白，为啥 heavily commited 这一串不能做主语？

作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2016-8-13 00:00

wangheyao 发表于 2016-8-12 23:54
being省略了那后面is的主语在哪里。。总要是名词或是名词短语做主语吧

突然明白了，刚才抽了

作者: Cynth1aC 时间: 2016-9-15 18:13
其实不是新题了，OG 12 #102里已经有了

作者: yading 时间: 2016-10-3 00:25
Mark一下！

作者: Kelly2017 时间: 2017-3-25 19:19
Mark一下！

作者: Dreamout 时间: 2017-3-30 10:38
感谢分享！

作者: zihanc 时间: 2017-4-4 23:04
111111111111111111111111111111111

作者: Raycyn 时间: 2017-6-20 21:52
感谢分享！

作者: GGGRRREEE 时间: 2017-7-9 15:09
谢谢，很受用

作者: 胡萝卜精 时间: 2017-7-15 18:30
顶楼主！

作者: Diawnopass 时间: 2017-8-13 12:26
Mark一下！

作者: FragranceDMG 时间: 2017-8-15 18:38
感谢分享！

作者: 杀鸡大法780 时间: 2017-9-15 17:37
感谢分享！

作者: 666GMAT666 时间: 2017-9-25 15:49
Mark一下！

作者: 666GMAT666 时间: 2017-9-25 15:51
感谢分享！

作者: 1258963277 时间: 2017-9-26 22:20
顶楼主！

作者: 柠晓夏 时间: 2017-10-2 21:13
深度好文，就要走心评价

作者: 黄苏打 时间: 2017-10-21 16:36
Mark一下！

作者: GabyH 时间: 2017-10-24 20:44
感谢分享！

作者: Fanny725 时间: 2017-10-26 22:33
感谢分享！

作者: Belieber3 时间: 2017-11-6 16:02
顶

作者: 神粥八宝 时间: 2017-12-5 10:34
感谢分享！

作者: Eleanorrr 时间: 2018-1-26 12:26
WOW！

here I have a question!!

If we use "with" + being,such as"with sushi being eaten in the restaurant, I was reading my book.", what should I do? >>delete being, then "with sushi eaten in the restaurant, I was reading my book."(It seems wired...If I wants to express that "I am eating sushi" and"I am reading" simultaneously happen？？)

作者: 小可爱啊 时间: 2018-7-31 08:56
感谢分享！

作者: gumgum330 时间: 2018-8-5 23:12
感谢分享！

作者: TuesdayA 时间: 2018-9-13 21:41
mark一记

作者: 全麦粑粑yumyum 时间: 2018-9-14 11:23
thanks

作者: shenhuajian 时间: 2018-12-5 05:41
顶楼主！

作者: hhjyy 时间: 2019-4-11 21:03
Mark一下！

作者: lfsunshinne 时间: 2019-8-13 00:55
谢谢楼主！

作者: Phantominee 时间: 2019-10-29 15:31
Mark一下！

作者: Dearzhang 时间: 2019-11-2 18:06
感谢！！！！

作者: 狐狸羊 时间: 2019-12-9 15:52
看一下！

作者: sssu1 时间: 2020-8-17 10:55
感谢分享

作者: laggtrue 时间: 2021-9-13 09:51
谢谢！

作者: 许观南 时间: 2021-10-6 20:25
感谢分享！

作者: YumiYaya 时间: 2021-10-20 13:39
码住！

作者: GMAT我可以 时间: 2021-11-27 19:17
感谢分享～

作者: stg.xchu 时间: 2022-5-21 06:24
感谢分享！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)