ChaseDream

标题: 大全-3-4 [打印本页]

作者: 海蓝    时间: 2003-8-27 11:20
标题: 大全-3-4

Which of the following best completes the passage below?

Sales campaigns aimed at the faltering personal computer market have strongly emphasized ease of use, called user-friendliness. This emphasis is oddly premature and irrelevant in the eyes of most potential buyers, who are trying to address the logically prior issue of whether----

(A) user-friendliness also implies that owners can service their own computers
(B) personal computers cost more the more user-friendly they are
(C) currently available models are user-friendly enough to suit them
(D) the people promoting personal computers use them in their own homes
(E) they have enough sensible uses for a personal computer to justify the expense of buying one

选E,我选成了B.

不是很明白这道题的逻辑关系.新东方上课时,费费的讲解是说"logically prior issue"是指必要条件,所以选项要跳出user-friendliness的层次.而A,C,D都是局限于user-friendliness,所以错.B错是因为price与user-friendliness无关.(E不是也说的expense的问题吗?~~)

看得一头雾水,大家帮着分析分析.谢谢~~~




作者: anchoret    时间: 2003-8-27 19:00
prior issue of most potential buyers:值不值


作者: 海蓝    时间: 2003-8-27 21:38
好像明白了些......不过,逻辑题可以只从常识上考虑吗?~~
我本来试着按费费说的必要条件什么的逻辑关系进行推理,结果越推越迷惑~~
作者: albert    时间: 2003-8-27 22:04
sometimes you should know what is required condition and what is sufficient condition..
for example, when the passage talk about "only if, assumption, unless..."

but in this passage, "prior" means a comparision..therefore,you don't need to think about what is required condition and what is sufficient condition...

in this passage, you should finish the passage by providing a reason why sales person should not emphasize on the the user-friendly characteristic of computers..

b is wrong because without addition information we can't clearly explain the reason why sales persons should not emphasize on the user-friendly characteristic..for example, if people care more about user-friendly than money, we can't use B as an reason to explain the argument...

e tells  us that comsumers concen more about whether the cost of user-friendly computes worth the expense, and therefore give an explanation to the conclusion the arguer makes..

作者: 海蓝    时间: 2003-8-27 22:21
太谢谢叼奶嘴的Albert了!!!明白得不能再明白了!!!
最近weaken练得太多了,忘了填空题解释题都是不需要什么推理的~~
汗~~
谢谢两位牛牛的指点!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3