ChaseDream

标题: “the other”的用法求解 [打印本页]

作者: Julibrissin    时间: 2016-6-14 15:33
标题: “the other”的用法求解
[attach]182359[/attach][attach]182360[/attach]
图一中这道题A的解释说the other的用法不完整,应该是one the other,所以A是错的
图二里这道题的A不也是只有the other吗》为什么它又对了??
大神们有明白的吗?


作者: Julibrissin    时间: 2016-6-14 15:34

The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to pursue what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as measles and yaws.
(A) what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
(B) what they had not previously considered a possibility--better control, if not eradication, of such infections like
(C) something they had not previously considered possible-better control, if not eradication, of such infections as
(D) something not considered a previous possibility--better control and perhaps eradication, of other infections such as
(E) the possibility of what they had not previously considered--better control and possibly eradication of infections like

Diesel engines burn as much as 30 percent less fuel than gasoline engines of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have been implicated in global warming.
(A) of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have
(B) of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases having
(C) of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases that have (D) that have a comparable size, and also they emit far less carbon dioxide gas and other gases that have
(E) that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases having
截图看的不清楚,我复制粘贴一下
作者: 毕出-Helr    时间: 2016-6-14 21:23
第一题的the other在语法上是没有错误的。
但是这个看似挺完美的the other其实赘余了。
这个the other其实是想把传染病(infections)分为两类,一类是前面讲过的天花,一类是后面讲的这些“其它”传染病(也就是the other infections)。
咱们联系整个句意看一下,句子说,根除天花的这个项目的成功刺激了专家们去追求以前不敢想的东西。这个句子表明,天花已经被根除了。
注意划线部分的插入语:better control, if not eradication。也就是说,划线部分里提到的这个infections,肯定是那些不能被根除的。(只有不能根除的,才能谈到better control嘛,根除了就不用控制了)
因此,划线部分中,只要我们说infections,观众就知道这些infections里不含天花了,而不用再加上the other来从infections里排除天花。
作者: Julibrissin    时间: 2016-6-21 15:09
毕出-Helr 发表于 2016-6-14 21:23
第一题的the other在语法上是没有错误的。
但是这个看似挺完美的the other其实赘余了。
这个the other其实 ...

果然抓住句意很重要啊!!谢谢~btw你就是传说中的毕出大大呀,看了你的好多资料,能直接对你说一句谢谢也很开心呢~~
作者: 毕出-Helr    时间: 2016-6-21 15:48
Julibrissin 发表于 2016-6-21 15:09
果然抓住句意很重要啊!!谢谢~btw你就是传说中的毕出大大呀,看了你的好多资料,能直接对你说一句谢谢也 ...






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3