ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD-5-Q30 [打印本页]

作者: steedzhu 时间: 2005-8-16 23:49
标题: [求助]GWD-5-Q30

GWD-5-Q30:

GWD-11-Q12:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. roponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

答案是E么？？？这个月考到了这个题目，想再确认一下，谢谢

作者: courtney8848 时间: 2005-8-17 00:34
the Answer should be C. you could check the taolun tiezi

作者: sensornet 时间: 2005-8-17 03:22
请不要误导，这道题现在好像没什么一定的结论。我认为C的错误是显然的，E比C好。

作者: steedzhu 时间: 2005-8-17 16:20

对亚，看了半天的讨论也没有看出什么结果，和上面楼一样，打算遇到了就坚持选E把，至少是自己的答案，感觉舒服点，呵呵。

作者: courtney8848 时间: 2005-8-18 06:46
to
{codestart}<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
document.write (usercolor('22','sensornet'));
</script>{codeend}sensornet:

呵呵﹐這位同學呀﹐做人虛心點﹐話也別說得太滿

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)