标题: 求解！关于限定性和非限定性定从的区别！ [打印本页] 作者: Evangeline璇 时间: 2016-5-19 21:36 标题: 求解！关于限定性和非限定性定从的区别！ Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.
A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established
D. Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established
E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing
选项分析：
A. Correct；the act of Congress是主语也是逻辑主语；法律法规的具体的内容要用ving修饰，比如法规规定捕的鱼必须小于一定尺寸，但此处made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C.意为“提供了政府迁移的相关条款”，并没有说明法律法规的具体内容，所以限定性定从更合适。
B. that引导的限定性定语从句不能被改为which引导的非限定性定语从句，因为“谈论的立法案是特指搬迁首都的那个”，因此必须用that引导的非限制性定语从句（如果用which引导的非限定性定语从句，则imply了“国会立法案就只有1800年颁布的那一个”，违背常识）；making作为伴随approved的结果状语，逻辑意思不合理，其应该是说明act的作用，修饰act
C. which指代太远不及A好；and的插入使得前面分句没有谓语，后面分句没有主语。
D. 主语前面部分冗长awkward；making作为非限定性修饰，使得句子表达的是act of Congress只有那么一个，违背常识。
E. The act of Congress少了限定性定语从句的修饰，使得句子表达的是act of Congress只有那么一个，违背常识；establish和make provision逻辑上是同一层次的，不应该把establish作为伴随结果(逻辑含义也变得不合理)，所以要不把also establishing改为and also establish，要不改为同A选项一样。
