As technologies and the damand for certain services change,many workers will lose their jobs.The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker,not to goverment or to business.
When new technologies came,many workers lose their jobs.Should the responsibility for those people to adjust to such change belong to the individual worker ,ot to govenment.Different people hold different view due to their different backgrounds.Whereas some people assert that workers should adjust to the change themselves,others raise the oppsotion that govenment or business trade should be take the responsibility.Recognizing that the situation should be viewed in a case-by-case situation.I claim that the individual worker himself should learn to adjust to the change.
The first argument to be presented to support my judgement is that the most important thing for a person is learn to survive,making a living on himself.Parents,in paticular,who have the responsibility to raise their childen, should try their best to adjust to the environment. According to Darwin`s theory of revolution,small animals are killed by the large ones,and the strongest individual survived in a species ,making the species more competitive in nature.Weak individuals disappeared because they can not accustomed to the environment.This is the logic of nature. Animals should struggle for their survival,not to mention people.Therefore,it is necessary for worker to adjust to the change themselves.
The second reason make me to choose this statement is not far to seek.If those worker do not worry about the lay-off problem himself, how can govenment and business help them.Frankly speaking ,as for business`s interest,the self-motivated employees who are willing to learn new things and devote themselve to their job are the most appropriate applicants .Those people can boost the company`s morale and to the most extent ,trigger the competition in the company,thus hancing the company`s productivity.
Admittedly,government and business also need to provide the workers necessary instruction and environment of adjusting.But this alone does not provide sufficient evidence to say that government and business should be responsible for the adjusting behavior.Actually,this reason is too weak and too specific to strenthen this view .
In sum,considering the reasons I mentioned above,which sometimes correlated with each other to generate a integrate whole and became more convincing than any single one.The responsibilit for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker,not only because the worker should learn to make a living by himself,but also because the adjusting behavior make the company more competitive.
帮偶看看这篇文章吧.观点和例子想了好久才出来的.谢谢.
As technologies and the damand for certain services change,many workers will lose their jobs.The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker,not to goverment or to business.
When new technologies came,many workers lose their jobs.Should the responsibility
和整体的时态不一致?
for those people to adjust to such change应该用复数比较好 belong这个和前面的单数主语搭配的话要假s to the individual worker ,ot to govenment.Different people hold different view用复数啊 due to their different backgrounds.Whereas some people assert that workers should adjust to the change themselves,others raise the oppsotion that govenment or business trade should be 去掉take the responsibility.Recognizing that the situation should be viewed in a case-by-case situation.I claim that the individual worker himself should learn to adjust to the change.
我觉得改成workers themselves会比较好,individual后面不是只可以加单数的
看了你后面的展开我觉得你的观点最好还是改成The responsibilty to adjust to this change should be mostly taken by the individual workers.
The first argument to be presented to support my judgement is that the most important thing for a person is learn to survive,making a living on himself.Parents,in paticular,who have the responsibility to raise their childen, should try their best to adjust to the environment. 个人觉得这两句逻辑上不是特别一致啊According to Darwin`s theory of revolution,small animals are killed by the large ones,and the strongest individual survived in a species ,making the species more competitive in nature.Weak individuals disappeared because they can not accustomed to the environment.This is the logic of nature. Animals should struggle for their survival,not to mention people.Therefore,it is necessary for worker to adjust to the change themselves.
The second reason make me to choose this statement is not far to seek.If those worker do not worry about the lay-off problem himself, how can govenment and business help them.Frankly speaking ,as for business`s interest,the self-motivated employees who are willing to learn new things and devote themselve to their job are the most appropriate applicants .Those people can boost the company`s morale and to the most extent ,trigger the competition in the company,thus hancing the company`s productivity.
Admittedly,government and business also need to provide the workers necessary instruction and environment of adjusting.But this alone does not provide sufficient evidence to say that government and business should be responsible for the adjusting behavior.Actually,this reason is too weak and too specific to strenthen this view .
In sum,considering the reasons I mentioned above,which sometimes correlated with each other to generate a integrate whole and became more convincing than any single one.The responsibilit for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker,not only because the worker should learn to make a living by himself,but also because the adjusting behavior make the company more competitive.
帮偶看看这篇文章吧.观点和例子想了好久才出来的.谢谢.
这篇不大好写,想的时间多一点没关系的。但是暴露出来的问题是细节的语法错的太多。后面的我没有仔细看,以后要留2-3分钟检查一下呀。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |