ChaseDream

标题: [OG求助]SC18题D选项如何解释 [打印本页]

作者: 锕儍    时间: 2016-3-27 10:42
标题: [OG求助]SC18题D选项如何解释
Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make aportable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of antsthat hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and thecolony larvae and pupae.

(C)  leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are

(D) leafcutters and most other ants in having nests

(菜鸟第一发求助帖,不知这样的格式是否正确,请大神多多包涵)

OG 解释是D选项会让人觉得situated underground……是在修饰后面的raider ants,然而我认为如果题干中下划线没有包括逗号的话会有这样的歧义,然而实际上逗号也被替换了,也就是说D选项nests后面是没有逗号的,这样的话situated肯定是修饰的前面的事物啊。是我的理解有误还是有别的更好地理由把D推翻?请前辈们解惑~


作者: 锕儍    时间: 2016-3-27 10:45
ddddddddddd
作者: elusive    时间: 2016-3-27 16:40
首先,千万不要觉得别人是“大神”,自己很弱。都是一样走过来的,这只是一个时间问题。大神有什么了不起的?我一定要比大神更强!!!
其次,要划线,不划线的话至少给出选项A是什么。

原文:
Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests

这里whose和in having 都是要形容蚂蚁的,whose明显要好于having。OG中说修饰R蚂蚁我认为是不可能的,in having怎么也不可能修饰到R蚂蚁,除非有逗号。

like和unlike的正确格式:
like A,(修饰A),B.....
你把它记住就行
如果第一个逗号缺失,往往是错的。
作者: 锕儍    时间: 2016-3-27 16:53
elusive 发表于 2016-3-27 16:40
首先,千万不要觉得别人是“大神”,自己很弱。都是一样走过来的,这只是一个时间问题。大神有什么了不起的 ...

讲得很清楚,而且附了原题,懂了,谢谢!
首发确实疏忽了忘了划线,现已改正~
作者: 医生吃鱼    时间: 2016-3-27 20:34
我觉得你说得对,D选项中 in having nests应该是往前修饰,不可能往后修饰raider ants。

所以这个选项的OG解释是错的。之后你会发现很多OG解释都是错的!!!所以我建议,碰到没把握的选项,最靠谱的办法还是上论坛!

另外,这题D选项unlike N。 in doing这个结构是绝对错误哦!
作者: 叶子姐姐    时间: 2016-8-14 18:59
可是我觉得og是想说unlike ...in....,表示不一样在于xxx,在于的就是in后面的东西,所以说og这样解释可能有他的道理
作者: feyonce    时间: 2016-8-24 06:34
目前查到的最合理解释:
in + VERBing is an ADVERB.
Generally, in + VERBing serves to modify the VERB IN THE FOLLOWING CLAUSE.
(D)... in having nests, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest.
Here, in having seems to modify make -- the action performed by raider ants.
这也解释了in having ...为什么不是修饰名词leaf cutters and most other ants,因为副词不能修饰名词

Since a VERBing modifier implies CONCURRENT action, the following meaning is conveyed:
When raider ants MAKE A PORTABLE NEST, they are simultaneously HAVING NESTS SITUATED UNDERGROUND OR IN PIECES OF WOOD.
显然前后矛盾。排除选项D

Ron 大神说过,永远不要质疑OG!

作者: 锕儍    时间: 2016-8-31 15:47
feyonce 发表于 2016-8-24 06:34
目前查到的最合理解释:
in + VERBing is an ADVERB.
Generally, in + VERBing serves to modify the VER ...

明白了你的意思,in doing这里的解释我很赞同,还想确认一下你的意思是不是
unlike leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests situated underground...., raider ants....
The meaning is, that the difference between raider ants and most other ants is that raider ants tend to have nests situated underground, so it deviates the original meaning of the sentence and we can drop it.
是这样吗?

作者: feyonce    时间: 2016-9-3 06:13
是的。the wrong answers have all been actually wrong -- either because they were grammatically wrong, or because something about their meaning wasn't reasonable.

这道题也可以用平行结构来排除D。comparisons involve parallel structure
Unlike ....balabala... raider ants make aportable nest subj+v
D  doesn’t make a parallel comparison ; C ...whose nest(sub) are(verb) parallel constructure

作者: 锕儍    时间: 2016-9-3 08:56
feyonce 发表于 2016-9-3 06:13
是的。the wrong answers have all been actually wrong -- either because they were grammatically wrong ...

good!非常感谢!
作者: 奋斗的金融mmiao    时间: 2017-2-21 08:48
但是这句话其实是把逗号滑进去的,所以依旧不能理解为什么D选项 IN doing 是修饰后面的。。。。。求助!!!
作者: Jaxzh    时间: 2017-3-24 02:18
raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form “curtains” of ants that hang from logs or boulders,

这里that,modifying curtains 对吗?
作者: 深高金的zkk    时间: 2020-7-5 18:28
in + v-ing 是当副词使用的, in the future类似的时间状语是可以当副词和形容词使用的,所以有时可以修饰前面的名词,有时不可以修饰前面的名词。
具体情况到时候随机应变

作者: 深高金的zkk    时间: 2020-7-5 18:32
feyonce 发表于 2016-8-24 06:34
目前查到的最合理解释:
in + VERBing is an ADVERB.
Generally, in + VERBing serves to modify the VER ...

感激!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3