125. The following appeared as part of the business plan of the Capital Idea investment firm.
“Across town in the Park Hill district, the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick Golf Club have all had business increases within the past two years. Capital Idea should therefore invest in the Roxy Playhouse, the Slice-o’-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new businesses in the Irongate district. As a condition, we should require them to participate in a special program: Any customer who patronizes two of the businesses will receive a substantial discount at the third. By motivating customers to patronize all three, we will thus contribute to the profitability of each and maximize our return.”
实在找不出呀！请多多指教！
就我看来
1、false analogy/misapplied generalization:三家成功，不代表另外不同地区的不同的三家也能成功
2、all things are equal:in the past two years 不意味着以后也会同样情况
3、false assumption: 光顾了两家，拿到第三家的折扣，不意味着顾客会因此去第三家，况且有可能顾客只去过一家，所以也无折扣可言！
4、就算顾客多了，也不代表profit会增长，这其中还有成本等问题！
我就想到大致这些把，大家可以多多构思一下！可能上面的东西比较乱，还需好好构造一下！！
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=26&ID=116162&page=5
这是以前的帖子，你也可以看一下，反正argu 也就那样几个攻击点啦。建议可先看看七宗罪！！！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |