In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
Ａ，Ｃ，Ｄ无关
Ｂ加强
Ｅ，题目问在什么情况下造成选民误解，这些选民认为 proposal是extending the local ordinances statewide，The state law 应该statewide适用，E相反
我觉得，这是个比较困难的题。
看到本题是，我认为本题的答案中应该提到local ordinances 。于是，看到答案C时，我觉得C应该是正确选项。其他选项我基本都没读完。
可答案却是E，真的让我想了很久。不知道自己的思路对不对。请大家一起探讨。
本题要找的是，在什么情况下，会让选民（认为要投票的提议是将其当地的法规推广到全州）产生误解。所谓误解，就是应该支持的却可能投反对票，或相反。
同时，还必须注意，campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” 。因为，选民听到的只有引号中的问题。必然是该问题的问法和其关于禁烟法规的经验，促使其产生误会。
综合上面两段，看E选项，The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking ，是不是可以说，就只知道该件事的情况下的人，是不是会因为州法律不起作用而不愿意支持呢？（实际他们可能是支持的，因为campaign workers who ask only，他们不知道The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.）
简单说，The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking当地的人，认为州法律是没有意义的。既然没有意义的，当你只问他“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”时，他只有一个答案，No.
回头看C，似乎也会造成误解，仔细想想，应该不会。这也是本题的一大难点。
啰嗦了这么多，也不知道是否思路正确。难啊。LAWYER在就好了！！
谢谢lawyer NN.就是不知道那个长帖在那？
ANYWAY，lawyer NN如此忙的时候，回答了问题。很感动！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |