ChaseDream

标题: 香港760(Q50,V41)放狗 [打印本页]

作者: zz68 时间: 2016-3-22 18:53
标题: 香港760(Q50,V41)放狗
作文
a real estate agent mentioned the below:

"Over the last five years, the housing prices in our city have doubled. During the same time, the stock market has fallen. So now it is a good time for the city residents to buy houses as an investment. In additional, home owners can also live in the houses they bought and that can improve one's quality of life, whereas there is no such similar benefit if one buys stocks."

数学
1. 一个大圆里面有一个小圆，小圆的半径是大圆的1/2. 求阴影面积和占大圆面积的比例。答案3/4

3.某个牛奶的shelf life average是9.6天，比(9.6+x) shelf life还长的可能性和比(9.6-x) shelf life还短的可能性是一样的， shelf life从（9.6-2.1）天到（9.6+2.1）天的总共可能性是68%, 问shelf life超过11.7天的可能性是多少？这个题考的是normal distribution, 答案是（1-68%）/2=16%
4. 一个学校一年要发总额为940000的奖学金，有三种不同额度的奖学金，一人95000，35000，10000，问奖学金获得者最少多少人？答案15 （940000=9*95000+1*35000+5*10000）

阅读
1. car dealer
-because cars nowadays are not distinguishable in terms of quality and functions, car dealers need to distinguish themselves via sales and services.
-sales and services are defined whether they are "best in kind." Customers define "best in kind" services as being able to have their cars fixed in one-go. 35% of the time car dealers cannot fix customers' cars in one go
-traditional mindset to solve this problem is to improve training for technicians at car delears.
-but there are three reason why such training approach actually cannot improve services for clients.

2. medevial women
这篇挺长的，有1.5屏，很多细节题，估计是难题库。
p1
-medevial time was considered a "golden time" for women in a lot of historians' minds. These historians believe that women's economic rights did not deteriate until 16th and 17th century when industrial revolution happened.
-mentiond two historians' studies to support the above conclusion. The studies were all about women in the 16th and 17th century.

p2
- but we cannot use evidence about women in the 16th and 17th century to argue points about women in the 15th century
-such economic deteriation for women in fact happened before 16th century. Quote some evidence to support this conclusion

P3
-There are some historians who are still very adament about believing women during Medeival time was doing fine.
-for example, quote two historians' studies and argue how they were flawed and over-simplified.

3. innovation in big vs. small companies
p1
-common belief is that big companies are more effective in their research and development (R&D) work and can get more out of R&D investment.
-but that is actually not the case. Small companies can actually get more out of their R&D investment than big companies can.

p2
-why can small companies get more out of their R&D investment than big companies can?
-once a new technology/ knoweldge is developed, it is very different to ring-fence. So over time other people will know this knowledge.
-small companies get as much knowledge from this "R&D" spillover as big companies do. Yet small companies pay less for R&D than big companies.
-so small companies get more bang for their buck

逻辑
1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier, it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

作者: jiangjiang2016 时间: 2016-3-22 18:56
呀，膜拜牛牛

作者: Crystal_Chai 时间: 2016-3-22 19:06
沾沾喜气！~~~~~~~~

作者: wzzdc1996 时间: 2016-3-22 19:40
沾沾喜气～露珠真厉害裤头还能考那么好的分数！希望明天我也能考得很好～谢谢露珠～

作者: alzn2765 时间: 2016-3-22 19:50
这个作文不太好写；
1. gratuitous assumption: investors who could invest in stock are equally qualified to invest in property. It is possible that the investors who could invest in stock do not possess the required capital to invest in property as the capital requirement for the latter is apparently higher than that of the former. (北京炒房首付要多少？炒股1000元就可以开户。不是哥不想炒房，无力装逼。)
2. gratuitous assumption: investors who invest in property will improve his quality of life. 哥投资的房子买在保定，哥在天安门上班，每天2点起来上班。。。。哥投资买的房子是shoebox unit，只有45平米，哥有7个娃外带老婆和双方父母，都住进去。。。。
3. Cost-benefit analysis: The high property price may not lead to high return. 卖房政府收200％的税咋整？每个月收100万物业费咋整？隔壁是黑社会每天砸门来敲门收保护费咋整？股票可以立即套现，房子不可以。

作者: 温润的风 时间: 2016-3-22 19:55
超赞楼主好厉害但是并没有看懂逻辑题的答案(´･_･`)

作者: hedingdingyiqi 时间: 2016-3-22 20:38
膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

作者: 小酥饭 时间: 2016-3-22 20:58

hedingdingyiqi 发表于 2016-3-22 20:38
膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

Mark一下！

作者: alzn2765 时间: 2016-3-22 21:01

hedingdingyiqi 发表于 2016-3-22 20:38
膜拜一下~lz太棒了！

感谢温润的风提醒，我的确错了。

1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier, it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

因（前提）： people being kind to their spouses
果（结论）： higher happiness level

加强要么是defender类加强：
非因果倒置，非无因果关系，非他因

要么是非因非果的加强：
非因：NOT kind to their spouses
非果：NOT higher happiness level

不管是哪一个答案，都必须有“非”，所以选项中无否定意思的必错。

狗主答案是：
非因果倒置：不是因为higher happiness level才kind to their spouses的。狗主答案正确。

作者: alzn2765 时间: 2016-3-22 21:02

温润的风发表于 2016-3-22 19:55
超赞楼主好厉害但是并没有看懂逻辑题的答案(´･_･`)

1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their happiniess level. the researcher concluded that people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level. How to strengthen the argument?
答案是researcher found out that just because people are happier, it doesn't mean they will be nicer their spouses.

因（前提）： people being kind to their spouses
果（结论）： higher happiness level

加强要么是defender类加强：
非因果倒置，非无因果关系，非他因

要么是非因非果的加强：
非因：NOT kind to their spouses
非果：NOT higher happiness level

不管是哪一个答案，都必须有“非”，所以选项中无否定意思的必错。

狗主答案是：
非因果倒置：不是因为higher happiness level才kind to their spouses的。狗主答案正确。

作者: 762380912 时间: 2016-3-22 21:51
楼主太厉害了吧，回忆的都是英文句子。我考完为什么连道数学题都想不起来

作者: dreambigk 时间: 2016-3-22 21:52
恭喜楼主。。来沾沾喜气。。。

作者: 温润的风 时间: 2016-3-22 21:59

alzn2765 发表于 2016-3-22 21:02
1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being kind to their spouses and their ...

谢谢alzn(￣▽￣)
但是文中不是说people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness level.
对她好导致幸福么 people being kind to their spouses不应该是原因么
答案说仅仅是因为幸福了并不能表明对她好
还是感觉有点乱理不清ಥ_ಥ

作者: zz68 时间: 2016-3-22 22:17

温润的风发表于 2016-3-22 21:59
谢谢alzn(￣▽￣)
但是文中不是说people being kind to their spouses will lead to higher happiness le ...

不好意思放狗的时候写得不是特别清楚。我拿中文再解释一遍，希望能清楚些：

题中researcher说对老婆老公好的人容易更happy （i.e. 对老公老婆好和happy程度是正相关的）。所以researcher的结论是：对老公老婆好导致人更happy. 问怎么strengthen这个argument

我的思路是：对老公老婆好和happy程度是正相关并不表示一定是第一件事（对老婆老公好）就一定导致第二件事，有可能是反过来第二件事导致第一件事（i.e. 开心的人更容易对老公老婆好）。

但是我选的选项否定了我的这个猜测。这个选项说的是：研究表明更开心的人不是更容易对老公老婆好-->不是第二件事导致第一件事-->加强了原文观点：第一件事导致第二件事

希望大家明白我啥意思

作者: alzn2765 时间: 2016-3-22 22:20

zz68 发表于 2016-3-22 22:17
不好意思放狗的时候写得不是特别清楚。我拿中文再解释一遍，希望能清楚些：

题中researcher说对老婆老公 ...

我明白你的意思，是我把因果弄反了。
改过来了
我现在对因果，果因不太敏感了，因为从充分必要条件角度理解，因果和果因的削弱是一样的：都是削弱必要条件的“唯一性”，或者割裂关系，倒置关系。A--->B我针对B或者箭头的方向，至于B是因还是果，其实不重要

作者: alzn2765 时间: 2016-3-22 22:23

zz68 发表于 2016-3-22 22:17
不好意思放狗的时候写得不是特别清楚。我拿中文再解释一遍，希望能清楚些：

题中researcher说对老婆老公 ...

一句话：A-->B的加强：不是B--->A (Defender类加强)
就这个意思。

作者: 温润的风 时间: 2016-3-22 22:50

zz68 发表于 2016-3-22 22:17
不好意思放狗的时候写得不是特别清楚。我拿中文再解释一遍，希望能清楚些：

题中researcher说对老婆老公 ...

嗯嗯现在明白了谢谢啦

作者: 温润的风 时间: 2016-3-22 22:50

alzn2765 发表于 2016-3-22 22:23
一句话：A-->B的加强：不是B--->A (Defender类加强)
就这个意思。

嗯嗯明白了原来不知道还可以这样加强所以感觉很乱

作者: xqx小飞侠 时间: 2016-3-22 22:53
分享很棒！CR又有收获到一种方法！感谢！过来沾沾喜气！

作者: 吕麦穗 时间: 2016-3-22 23:13
赞楼主，沾喜气！

作者: jaidenzt 时间: 2016-3-22 23:21
楼主记忆力超强阿！！！！！

作者: VV镜子 时间: 2016-3-23 01:03
谢楼主分享，这题CR的解答非常有收获！！！！

作者: hedingdingyiqi 时间: 2016-3-23 01:11

alzn2765 发表于 2016-3-22 21:01
感谢温润的风提醒，我的确错了。

1. somebody did a research on the relationship between people being ...

收到~~不好意思没及时回复~感谢~~

作者: starwt 时间: 2016-3-23 11:47
Thanks for sharing , good luck!!!

作者: hedingdingyiqi 时间: 2016-3-23 12:02
狗主好~~~第三篇阅读考古求确认~~
大公司和小公司在R&D（research and development）上的优势
1. 段落大意：
P1：人们普遍认为大公司应该是比小公司在R&D方面更有优势但是其实不是这样的然后接着进行解释。现在好多小企业的R&D的收益率要大于大企业，为什么？这是为什么呢？？
P2：说是这个新研发出来的东西，不可能完全被一个公司永远独占，这个新的成果总是在各个公司之间交流的，而这个小的公司在获取新的研究成果上比这个大公司要更方便（有更多的途径）。所以这个小的企业虽然在这个研发方面投钱不多，但获得的回报是很丰厚的。
2. 题目： Q1. 哪个能解释为啥小公司比大公司更容易获得最新成果？
选项有
A、小公司的这种研发比大公司的更吸引有才的人；
B、大公司的这个研发的经费运用的没有小公司的有效；
C、小公司的研发人员有的是从大公司跳槽来的（我选的这个）（本月狗主Q51，V34）
Q2. 还有一篇大公司小公司对于new knowledge的运用。说是小公司其实比大公司更能运用new knowledge产生效益，cost 比较低。其中有一题是我选的是小公司比大公司更能efficiently运用new knowledge. (本月710分狗主)
Q3. 主旨题
Q4. 我好像想起一个问题就是说从文章能推出什么（V33狗主）
一些在商战中的信息由于它的时效性很高所以更需要保密（这个我没选这个是safety我觉得是无关选项）
说到了safety（我觉得整片文章里没有提到关于信息保护这个概念所以我都给否了）

作者: bunny拼GT 时间: 2016-3-23 12:06
沾喜气！！

作者: lanlanlan1220 时间: 2016-3-24 11:43
感谢楼主分享~~~

作者: 鹿鹿纬纬 时间: 2016-3-24 12:49
感谢分享！

作者: chasedreamv 时间: 2016-3-24 16:54
恭喜狗主，谢谢分享

作者: ivanpan 时间: 2016-3-25 16:33
强力粘粘考运！！谢谢楼主！

作者: 花木头 时间: 2016-3-25 21:40
666666666666666666666

作者: AInWonderland 时间: 2016-3-27 23:02
沾沾楼主喜气，把好运传给我吧！谢谢楼主恭喜你！

作者: elspeth0818 时间: 2016-4-6 19:27
楼主真棒！！！

作者: ping11 时间: 2016-4-7 11:40
狗主能不能说说你的背景例如本科，工作学习经历，我们也好有个对照参考。谢啦！

作者: zz68 时间: 2016-4-18 17:27

ping11 发表于 2016-4-7 11:40
狗主能不能说说你的背景例如本科，工作学习经历，我们也好有个对照参考。谢啦！ ...

请见我写得另外一篇： http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... ;page=1#pid22728901

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)