ChaseDream

标题: 关于RON总结的ing现在分词的一点疑惑 [打印本页]

作者: 玛德滞涨 时间: 2016-3-22 11:52
标题: 关于RON总结的ing现在分词的一点疑惑
-- the subject of the preceding clause should also make sense as the agent of the -ING action.

examples:
Joe broke the window, angering his father. -->this sentence makes sense, because it correctly implies that joe"a ngered his father".
the window was broken by Joe, angering his father.--> this sentence doesn't make sense, because it implies that the window(i.e., not joe himself) angered joe's father.

my brother tricked me, disappointing Dad --> implies that dad is disappointed in my brother for tricking me (and not necessarily disappointed in me for being tricked).
i was tricked by my brother, disappointing Dad --> implies that dad is disappointed in me because i fell for my brother's trick (and not that he's disappointed in my brother for tricking me).

实战中需要考虑这一点吗，后面的ving的逻辑主语需要和前面主句的主语一致？
我怎么觉得是主句的整个句子来做后面ving的逻辑主语啊？
有没有大神可以解释一下或者举些反驳RON这一点的GMAT中的正确句子啊？？

作者: elusive 时间: 2016-3-22 17:11
他说的话都是对的，真理，没法反驳。

他实际上说的是 v-ing修饰的是主语+谓语，这个修饰主语差不多。

也就是所谓的：伴随结果或者伴随动作

比如第一个吧： Joe broke the window, angering his father anger修饰的是Joe打碎了玻璃，可能是伴随结果。

实战：
Neuroscientists,having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

A)Neuroscientists,having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are

B)Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

C)Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

D)Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood ,

It will be helpful if experts can advise the solution and reason for the solution

关于v-ing的两个选项A和D，为什么A对了？为什么D错了？

作者: 玛德滞涨 时间: 2016-3-22 22:17

elusive 发表于 2016-3-22 17:11
他说的话都是对的，真理，没法反驳。

他实际上说的是 v-ing修饰的是主语+谓语，这个修饰主语差不多。

就是这道题！疑惑
解释说的因为drawing不能表伴随修饰前面的现在完成时，所以只能作定语修饰就近的adulthood
那如果表结果呢。。。？不就能说得通了

作者: 玛德滞涨 时间: 2016-3-22 22:18

elusive 发表于 2016-3-22 17:11
他说的话都是对的，真理，没法反驳。

他实际上说的是 v-ing修饰的是主语+谓语，这个修饰主语差不多。

哦貌似是因为表直接结果这里drawing也不能作为直接结果所以只能做定语

作者: elusive 时间: 2016-3-23 01:35

玛德滞涨发表于 2016-3-22 22:17
就是这道题！疑惑
解释说的因为drawing不能表伴随修饰前面的现在完成时，所以只能作定语修饰就近的adulth ...

其实v-ing都有修饰前面名词的嫌疑
比如Joe broke the window, angering his father. angering有可能修饰window，但是现已很小因为前面句子很短，迫使他修饰joe broke的几率更大一些。

D里面句子太长了，实在太长了了，所以下结论修饰修饰audithood的概率更大一些。

假设没有A，D就是正确答案。A的好处是这个嫌疑取消了。

也就是说这样的句子结构：，主语 +谓语+ 宾语 +（定语从句+谓语+宾语），v-ing 宾语......
这里ving既可以修饰主谓可以修饰定语从句里面的宾语。

如果定语从句长，那么修饰宾语的概率就很大，如果句子短，那么修饰主谓的概率就很大。

此外如果句子有很强烈的因果关系，那么用v-ing也可以。
判断词语比如causing, including,making等。
但是科学家获得经验和下结论没有那么强的因果关系，所以用drawing也不是很好。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)