57. The following appeared as part of an article in a popular arts and leisure magazine.
“The safety codes governing the construction of public buildings are becoming far too strict. The surest way for architects and builders to prove that they have met the minimum requirements established by these codes is to construct buildings by using the same materials and methods that are currently allowed. But doing so means that there will be very little significant technological innovation within the industry, and hence little evolution of architectural styles and design — merely because of the strictness of these safety codes.”
看了题目我怎么觉得有两个结论啊?
一个是建筑师会使用当前允许的材料施工
另一个是这样就没有了创新
不懂
望高手指教啊
57.一份流行休闲杂志上的文章：
监控公共建筑物的安全条例（code？）已经变得太严格了。对建筑师和施工者来说，最可靠的证实他们满足这些条例带来的最小的要求的方法，是使用当前允许的同样的材料和技术来建造建筑。这样，仅仅因为安全条例的严格，行业内将几乎没有技术革新，因此也就没有建筑风格和设计的变化。
文章反对现行条例，认为这样会过于严格乃至阻碍了革新
因为这是AA...所以你写文章得说现行条例好...不会阻碍革新等等...
有很多可以攻击的点，我先不赘述了。如果LZ暂时没思路，再献丑
拉了一个0哦，改下标题吧要么fish的精彩讲解以后的人就找不到了多可惜啊！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |