ChaseDream

标题: 不会做,没思路,求帮助 [打印本页]

作者: elusive    时间: 2016-2-27 09:39
标题: 不会做,没思路,求帮助
Telomerase is an enzyme that is produced only in cells that are actively dividing. For this reason it is generally absent from body tissues in adults. Bone marrow is an exception to this rule, however, since even in adults, bone marrow cells continually divide to replace old blood cells. Cancers are another exception, because their cells are rapidly dividing.

The information provided most strongly supports which of the following?

A. Telomerase is the only enzyme that is present in cancerous cells but absent from cells that are not actively dividing.
B. In children, the only body tissues from which telomerase is absent are those in which cells are not rapidly dividing.
C. The presence of telomerase in bone marrow is no indication of bone marrow cancer.
D. Cancer of the bone marrow develops more rapidly than cancer growing in any other kind of adult tissue.
E. The level of telomerase production is always higher in cancerous tissue than in noncancerous tissue

作者: alzn2765    时间: 2016-2-27 10:09
A. Telomerase is the only enzyme that is present in cancerous cells but absent from cells that are not actively dividing.
B. In children, the only body tissues from which telomerase is absent are those in which cells are not rapidly dividing.
C. The presence of telomerase in bone marrow is no indication of bone marrow cancer.
D. Cancer of the bone marrow develops more rapidly than cancer growing in any other kind of adult tissue.
E. The level of telomerase production is always higher in cancerous tissue than in noncancerous tissue(无关)
注意题中Tissue with Telomerase,bome marrow,cancerous tissue这三者间是没有任何比较的。所以有这三者之间比较的都一定错,可以轻易的排除DE。

作者: elusive    时间: 2016-2-27 14:22
alzn2765 发表于 2016-2-27 10:09
A. Telomerase is the only enzyme that is present in cancerous cells but absent from cells that are n ...

好,又不会的再问你
作者: alzn2765    时间: 2016-2-27 16:06
elusive 发表于 2016-2-27 14:22
好,又不会的再问你

我发的帖能找到我的微信
我给你个忠告:看了一些你的回帖,我觉得你太执迷于Helr的分类了,就好象曾经的我,到最后会变成“方法”的奴隶。明明是正确答案,因为用Helr分类无法解释而看着不选。
首先,Helr分类不是一个可以解决所有题的方法,Helr分类中有错误,也有死角-有些题用Helr分类不能解。
有些Helr分类中坚持的“原则”,其实是不正确的,因为Hel忽略了某些没有考虑到的情况。
GMAT的逻辑题最终还是以把题做出啦为目的,从这个角度上讲GMAT考试甚至是功利的:有些能把题做对的人却不一定知道答案的逻辑是什么。
你可能做题还没达到一个量的积累,所以你可能还没遇到“Helr无力”的情况,我可以很负责任的告诉你:有很多。越是考试题,越多。
为了佐证,你思考几个问题:
因果推理中CQ之中间因素,你见过任何一道采用这个CQ的题吗?
因果推理的CQ可以是“同因异果”,有的说“同因异果”不可以削弱果因推理,因为这两种推理模式CQ对冲。果真如此吗?
两个没有因果关系的事件A与B,怎么加强?怎么削弱?

希望你多思考,永远考虑能把题做出来的最简单方法是什么,而不是拘泥于某个方法。


作者: elusive    时间: 2016-2-28 06:52
alzn2765 发表于 2016-2-27 16:06
我发的帖能找到我的微信
我给你个忠告:看了一些你的回帖,我觉得你太执迷于Helr的分类了,就好象曾经的我 ...

我改错没问题了,但是逻辑还差得远。改错自己总结的,逻辑自己总结不出来所以还是看看其他人怎么想的。
作者: 典座    时间: 2020-7-13 07:30
alzn2765 发表于 2016-2-27 16:06
我发的帖能找到我的微信
我给你个忠告:看了一些你的回帖,我觉得你太执迷于Helr的分类了,就好象曾经的我 ...

同意!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3