ChaseDream

标题: 最新出炉:Lawyer的OG10题型分类 [打印本页]

作者: 携隐    时间: 2005-7-20 09:12
标题: 最新出炉:Lawyer的OG10题型分类

Assumption: 8/21/36/48/63/76/80/103/104/122/123/130/139/151/162/167/171/173/195/202/

Justify the conclusion: 19/46/92/100/

Weaken:

2/4/5/7/9/12/14/18/27/29/31/39/41/43/52/61/64/67/68/70/78/81/93/96/101/102/105/110/

111/112/113/114/119/120/125/131/132/136/137/141/143/144/146/147/154/157/158/163/

166/168/170/176/178/179/180/182/183/186/187/188/191/192/193/194/196/198/200/201/203/

Support:

3/17/23/28/30/32/34/35/37/50/53/55/60/66/74/82/83/87/89/109/121/124/

126/129/134//140/156/159/165/172/184/185/189/190/197/199

Must be true:

10/11/15/20//25/33/69/72/90/91/94/95/99/107/115/116/117/135/142/145/150/164/169/174/175/

Main idea: 88/138/

Paradox (Explanation):

13/40/45/49/57/71/84/86/108/118/127/133/148/149/153/160/161/177/

Flaw: 16/26/44/47/59/65/73/77/79/128/152/181/204/

Evaluation: 42/51/56/85/97/155/

Principle: 24/98/106/

Fill. 1/6/22/38/58/62/75

Bold(role): 205/

Parallel: 54/

感谢Lawyer百忙之中还抽出时间做此总结!请大家好好利用。


作者: swlfx    时间: 2005-7-20 10:01
呵呵,第一个看到,强烈感谢两位斑竹。
作者: quiny    时间: 2005-7-20 10:34
3x
作者: 蓝夕叶子    时间: 2005-7-20 12:12
顶!
作者: swellingiceberg    时间: 2005-7-20 13:03

赞!


作者: xxiaoyan    时间: 2005-7-20 13:16
ding
作者: howardwang    时间: 2005-7-20 13:30

谢谢两位NN!


必然收益良多!


作者: Youknowme    时间: 2005-7-20 19:17
太谢谢了!
作者: davyq    时间: 2005-7-20 20:35
非常感谢!
作者: chelin_wu1220    时间: 2005-7-20 20:55


3x


作者: icare1    时间: 2005-7-20 23:29

好像以下三种没有出现在分类中。。。


METHOD OF REASONING(包括ROLE


FLAW IN THE REASONING


POINT AT ISSUE


作者: 携隐    时间: 2005-7-21 00:28

一和三应该是LSAT中的题型。Flaw有出现呀。


作者: cocoabean    时间: 2005-7-21 05:41
谢谢隐MM, 终于等到了!
作者: zhoushao    时间: 2005-7-21 06:25
顶!!!
作者: wennier    时间: 2005-7-26 08:07

COOL


THANKS A LOT


作者: 晴耕雨读    时间: 2005-7-29 14:35
感谢XY MM和lawyer!!!
作者: ethyl    时间: 2005-7-29 15:04

很好。感谢前辈!


作者: lfeng08908    时间: 2005-7-29 23:09
xiexie
作者: leonchan    时间: 2005-7-31 01:59

我做了一个“OG CR 分类Lawyer版”,请到此处下载:


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=124077



作者: happyfish0517    时间: 2005-7-31 07:38
up!!
作者: catree    时间: 2005-7-31 08:31
thanks for both of you.
作者: sammaijgd    时间: 2005-7-31 16:50
谢谢 了!!!!
作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-1 05:28

在Lawyer的分类中,OG114为weaken,而OG152为flaw.


个人认为这两道题目完全是类似的:都是讲一个program/method的实施,最risky的一部分人是最不原意参加的.所以weaken program/method.


114. The more frequently employees take time to exercise during working hours each week, the fewer sick days they take. Even employees who exercise only once a week during working hours take less sick time than those who do not exercise. Therefore, if companies started fitness programs, the absentee rate in those companies would decrease significantly.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?


(A) Employees who exercise during working hours occasionally fall asleep for short periods of time after they exercise.


(B) Employees who are frequently absent are the least likely to cooperate with or to join a corporate fitness program.


(C) Employees who exercise only once a week in their company’s fitness program usually also exercise after work.


(D) Employees who exercise in their company’s fitness program use their working time no more productively than those who do not exercise. B


(E) Employees who exercise during working hours take slightly longer lunch breaks than employees who do not exercise.




152. Mouth cancer is a danger for people who rarely brush their teeth. In order to achieve early detection of mouth cancer in these individuals, a town’s public health officials sent a pamphlet to all town residents, describing how to perform weekly self-examinations of the mouth for lumps.



Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the pamphlet as a method of achieving the public health officials’ goal?


(A) Many dental diseases produce symptoms that cannot be detected in a weekly self-examination.


(B) Once mouth cancer has been detected, the effectiveness of treatment can vary from person to person.


(C) The pamphlet was sent to all town residents, including those individuals who brush their teeth regularly.


(D) Mouth cancer is much more common in adults than in children. E


(E) People who rarely brush their teeth are unlikely to perform a weekly examination of their mouth.


所以,为何lawyer的分类,前者是weaken, 后者是flaw.


请大家帮助解答一下我的问题,谢谢!


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-1 09:30

Lawyer分类中的Principle是什么分类, 可以并入归纳题吗?


谢谢!


作者: 携隐    时间: 2005-8-1 10:56
Principle好像在GMAT中没有出现。可能是LSAT的题型吧。flaw和weaken的区别,我觉得flaw侧重于推理过程中的错误,而weaken侧重于推理过重中作者所忽略的东西(没有考虑周全)。具体的区别,好像很难表达。等待LAWYER NN来解释。
作者: juningw    时间: 2005-8-1 10:58

作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-1 11:05

谢谢携隐前辈.


waiting...


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-2 11:25

Still waiting...


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-2 21:47
UP!
作者: davidzheng    时间: 2005-8-2 22:03
Thanks. Great job!
作者: JessicaCDer    时间: 2005-8-2 22:28
谢谢
作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-3 05:16

又有一问题, OG201可以归到flaw类吗? 好像属于自相矛盾的逻辑错误.请指正!


201.State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson’s argument?


(A) In the spokesperson’s state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past six years than it has in several other states.


(B) Adequacy of a state’s road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing business there than is the availability of qualified employees.


(C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have business have moved into the state.


(D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state’ road system depends on both the area and the population of the state. E


(E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road improvements.




作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2005-8-3 09:47
分类主要看问题如何问。并不是看原文。FLAW是要你指出原文推理的逻辑错误,答案可以是直接指出原文的推理的错误,就像OG152,也可以是用GENERAL WORD(逻辑语言)指出:比如将充分条件当作必要条件。WEAKEN是问你下面某个选项削弱了原文推理或结论的说服力。
作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-8-3 22:23
以下是引用lawyer_1在2005-8-3 9:47:00的发言:
分类主要看问题如何问。并不是看原文。FLAW是要你指出原文推理的逻辑错误,答案可以是直接指出原文的推理的错误,就像OG152,也可以是用GENERAL WORD(逻辑语言)指出:比如将充分条件当作必要条件。WEAKEN是问你下面某个选项削弱了原文推理或结论的说服力。

明白, 其实分类并不是十分重要. 关键在于理解原文, 并根据问题的问法得出正确答案.

谢谢Lawyer百忙之中解答问题!


作者: zenger    时间: 2005-8-9 18:43

好东西,决定按关键词自己也总结一下。


谢谢lawyer提供了一个非常好的思路。


作者: wwwhahchn    时间: 2005-8-11 02:05

刚看到,顶!!!


抱回去好好研究!!!


作者: dovecat    时间: 2005-9-6 11:50
lawyer 分类中好像没有conclusion,而是打碎细分了阿。
作者: 寂寞的声音    时间: 2005-9-6 13:21
3x
作者: advantage    时间: 2005-9-13 06:04
thanks  lawyer
作者: foreinter    时间: 2005-9-13 10:25

104. Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 – when outlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.



The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?


(A) Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.


(B) Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.


(C) Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.


(D) In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was. D


(E) Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.





122. When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.



The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?


(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.


(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year.


(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.


(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. C


(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.



123. Advertisement: Today’s customers expect high quality. Every advance in the quality of manufactured products raises customer expectations. The company that is satisfied with the current quality of its products will soon find that its customers are not. At MegaCorp, meeting or exceeding customer expectations is our goal.



Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements in the advertisement above?



(A) MegaCorp’s competitors will succeed in attracting customers only if those competitors adopt MegaCorp’s goal as their own.


(B) A company that does not correctly anticipate the expectations of its customers is certain to fail in advancing the quality of its products.


(C) MegaCorp’s goal is possible to meet only if continuing advances in product quality are possible.


(D) If a company becomes satisfied with the quality of its products, then the quality of its products is sure to decline. C


(E) MegaCorp’s customers are currently satisfied with the quality of its products.



两个问题:


1. 象104 和122这两题的提问涉及到unless句型,也应该归为assumption吗?请解释一下


2. 123题我觉得是Must be true题型,怎么是assumption 呢?


本人愚笨,请NN指教


作者: jjll    时间: 2005-9-29 20:10

请问30题为什么归为support呢?


30. The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.



Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?


A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.


B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.


C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.


D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.


E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-10-6 08:59
以下是引用foreinter在2005-9-13 10:25:00的发言:

两个问题:

1. 象104 和122这两题的提问涉及到unless句型,也应该归为assumption吗?请解释一下


2. 123题我觉得是Must be true题型,怎么是assumption 呢?


本人愚笨,请NN指教



不是NN, 试解:

1. not A unless B 表达为: A-->B, B为必要条件(assumption). 通常情况下我们所说的assumption都是必要型假设. 当然也有充分性假设(justify the conclusion). 具体见lawyer的实战方法篇, 真的很经典.

2. 个人也偏向这题是Infer/Must be true题. 只是这题有点特殊.

我们先看正确选项C: MegaCorp's goal is possible to meet only if continuing advances in product quality are possible. "only if"必要性指示词, 所以该选项的充分必要关系为: goal is possible-->advances in product quality are possible.

所以单单在选项中, 我们看出advances in product quality are possible是goal is possible的必要条件, 即是假设.

我们再来看全文, 全文的推理过程是: 顾客期望高质量, 且一旦满足了顾客的期望, 顾客又有更进一步的要求. 所以要满足顾客的需要只有进一步提高质量. 而这个结论正是选项C这个命题所能表达的. 所以从根本上说, 两者不存在矛盾.

不过"分类要看问题如何问", 我还是偏向这题是Must be true, 只是这道题的答案刚好是个假设命题.

个人理解, 大家讨论!  


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-6 9:14:13编辑过]

作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-10-6 09:20
30题关键在于对问题的理解: 这里是basis for economically sound pricing method, 而不是basis for historical costing. 注意对criticism的理解.
作者: simon07    时间: 2005-10-7 19:13

顶!急我之所急!


作者: amy9301    时间: 2005-11-17 14:33
up
作者: hy09    时间: 2005-12-15 19:45

thank you very much


作者: zbaby    时间: 2006-1-2 17:06

謝謝!真是好東西!




作者: feefee    时间: 2006-1-5 13:22



作者: yulin115    时间: 2006-1-11 02:06

Thank you so much! Ding....


作者: willy1209    时间: 2006-2-1 05:13
标题: thanks man
thanks man i appreciate it
作者: bigtone    时间: 2006-5-4 01:19
Thanks.
作者: helen_helen    时间: 2006-6-2 17:01
thanks a lot
作者: jenny22    时间: 2006-6-3 09:46
向lawyer 表达最高的敬意
作者: dz    时间: 2006-6-8 10:38
感谢lawyer和携隐,呵呵
作者: pumbaa    时间: 2006-7-4 10:18

刚发现这个好东西。

感谢lawyer和携隐!


作者: yolaunndalyy    时间: 2006-7-21 13:06

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-26 8:31:32编辑过]

作者: Sunny1000    时间: 2006-8-17 01:27
感謝
作者: bonny0_0    时间: 2006-11-4 15:33

merci

thanks


作者: 孩子气诺诺    时间: 2006-11-4 20:35

是哪个版本的og啊???
有200多道题???

11版的只有83题啊。。。。


作者: luckypf99    时间: 2006-11-21 13:24
由衷感谢!
作者: xinxin650    时间: 2007-1-30 20:10
3X
作者: 啼血的梦    时间: 2007-3-2 15:49
谢谢
作者: fancycc    时间: 2007-5-2 12:25
谢谢,粉有帮助!!
作者: xuxuxixi    时间: 2007-8-25 10:46
谢谢~!!一定会好好利用!!
作者: jullylee1314    时间: 2007-9-1 15:42
good  excellent
作者: wishful_way    时间: 2007-9-2 04:49
well done~ Niubility
作者: MGi_Rei    时间: 2007-9-2 16:13
谢谢!!!!!!!
作者: flealda    时间: 2007-9-4 12:53

非常感谢,因为一直觉得FF逻辑对我没什么用,LAWYER的讲述让我受益匪浅


作者: yarmaran    时间: 2007-10-3 23:33
标题: 2007年10月Math原始机经滚动汇总 10.03. 14:00
谢谢了 很实用:)也是10版的og么
作者: franchesca    时间: 2007-10-6 06:22
Thx sooooooooooooo much!
作者: wgaggassi34    时间: 2007-10-6 15:08
重谢!!!
作者: lily_ding    时间: 2007-12-9 02:06
Thanks!
作者: Sheisshannon    时间: 2008-1-22 01:22

强烈感谢!


作者: kellycui    时间: 2008-2-25 18:33

非常感谢! NN原来是这样练成的!!!! 太牛了!


作者: lovelykaka    时间: 2008-4-21 08:07
非常感谢~~~~
作者: shuwu    时间: 2008-4-28 06:29

thanks alot


作者: haleven    时间: 2008-6-13 12:36

无法领会到这的真谛.   可能是我能力太差.    


作者: chenliqiang    时间: 2008-7-7 21:44

我看到这个都要哭了..太感谢了阿


作者: 勇敢做梦    时间: 2008-7-9 12:34
真的很感谢,给我们这种刚刚踏上考T的人很大的帮助!
作者: susanmz78    时间: 2008-8-7 01:27

有没有的og11逻辑分类呀?


作者: 火火ivy    时间: 2008-8-21 13:26
我的OG11是124道题的呀……晕……到底这是哪个版本的?

作者: litoky    时间: 2008-9-19 14:38
good sharing
作者: litoky    时间: 2008-9-19 15:01
thanks
作者: babysdlulu    时间: 2008-10-11 14:26

请问这是OG11么


作者: Chris12478    时间: 2008-10-14 04:19
这是OG 11吗?
作者: WSarah    时间: 2009-1-5 18:14

Thank you


作者: celina2004    时间: 2009-3-28 15:52
太谢谢了
作者: hollyprinces    时间: 2009-4-12 23:41
以下是引用火火ivy在2008-8-21 13:26:00的发言:
我的OG11是124道题的呀……晕……到底这是哪个版本的?

Which edition is this?Mine only has 124 too!!!


作者: ubimr    时间: 2009-4-20 15:57
thx
作者: bearEileen    时间: 2009-4-20 17:43
有点不明白,OG第十版CR不是只有82题吗?这个200多题的版本是怎么出来的啊??麻烦帮忙回复一下谢谢
作者: bearEileen    时间: 2009-4-20 17:46
请问一下这个是什么版本的OG啊
作者: 幸福的莹莹    时间: 2009-5-9 01:00
谢谢~~
作者: 冰雪椰子    时间: 2009-7-17 18:22
感激不尽,定会好好学习!
作者: LLE    时间: 2009-7-20 16:20
多谢楼主
作者: lucy1006    时间: 2009-8-25 17:25
超棒的分类~
作者: zhouyi11    时间: 2009-8-25 18:03
great,thx
作者: suyu77    时间: 2009-8-25 21:46
OG10的应该是
作者: levykoo    时间: 2009-8-26 10:30
xiexie
作者: 2410026yutao    时间: 2009-8-29 10:56
标题: 回复:(携隐)最新出炉:Lawyer的OG题型分类
顶起来
作者: Dreamsgirl    时间: 2009-9-1 01:52





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3